To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What we stand for: Reputation platforms in Scandinavian higher education
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. (Strategic Communication)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8500-1114
School of Economic and Business, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
2018 (English)In: Universities as Agencies: Reputation and Professionalization / [ed] Tom Christensen, Åse Gornitzka, Francisco O. Ramirez, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, p. 155-181Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Reputation is derived from “being known for something” (Lange, Lee, & Dai, 2010, p. 157). Accordingly, reputation and branding literatures emphasize that reputation is built from “common starting points” (van Riel, 1995, p. 35), “an innermost substance” (Kapferer, 2008, p. 95), or “irrefutable essence” (Keller, 1999, p. 45), indicating what organizations stand for, and which “each company will be able to identify” (van Riel, 1995, p. 19). The definition of these characteristics typically results from strategy processes, and may include various symbolic expressions such as core values, visions, missions, brand propositions, and taglines. Positive associations are assumed to be stimulated in the minds of observers when all external communication is derived from such platforms in a consistent manner (van Riel & Fombrun, 2007).

This chapter examines the contents of reputation platforms used by Scandinavian higher education institutions. More specifically, we focus on core value statements as they are presented on these institutions’ web sites. Core value statements are prominent aspects of reputation platforms not only because they define what organizations stand for and want to be known for (Sataøen, 2015), but also because they guide any work intended to influence reputation. Whereas a number of studies have revealed higher education institutions’ interest in a favorable reputation (Aula & Tienari, 2011; Bowman & Bastedo, 2009; Christensen & Gornitzka, 2017; Wæraas & Solbakk, 2009), no research has, to our knowledge, examined the platforms defined by universities and colleges as the starting point for their reputation management efforts and distinguished between the different types of desired reputations associated with these platforms. For example, it is not known whether higher education institutions fill their reputation platforms with core values implicating a performative or a moral reputation (see chapter 1). Accordingly, we ask, which types of values do Scandinavian higher education institutions seek to be known for, and which type of reputation do they implicate?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. p. 155-181
Series
Public Sector Organizations
Keywords [en]
Core value statements, Reputation platforms, Rationalization of higher education, Scandinavian higher education institutions
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-68734DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92713-8ISBN: 978-3-319-92712-1 (print)ISBN: 978-3-319-92713-8 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-68734DiVA, id: diva2:1245314
Available from: 2018-09-05 Created: 2018-09-05 Last updated: 2018-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Sataøen, Hogne Lerøy

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sataøen, Hogne Lerøy
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 337 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf