To Örebro University

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation improves patient-reported outcomes (PROs), irrespective of mode of intermittent rhythm monitoring.

Purpose: To evaluate the use of an AF-specific and a generic PRO instrument during continuous rhythm monitoring two years after AF ablation.

Methods: Fifty-four patients completed the generic SF-36 and the AF-specific AF6 questionnaires before and six, 12 and 24 months after AF ablation. All patients underwent continuous ECG monitoring via an implantable loop recorder. The generic PRO scores were compared to those of a Swedish age- and sex-matched population.

Results: After ablation both summary scores reached normative levels at 24 months, while physical functioning, role-physical and vitality remained lower than norms. Responders to ablation (AF burden <0.5%) reached the norms in all individual SF-36 domains, while non-responders (AF burden >0.5%) reached norms only in social functioning. All AF6 items and the sum score showed moderate to large improvement in both responders and non-responders, although responders had significantly lower scores 24 months after ablation. Higher AF burden was independently associated with poorer PCS and AF6 sum score.

Conclusions: The AF-specific AF6 questionnaire was more sensitive to changes related to AF burden than the generic SF-36. Patients improved as documented by both instruments, but a higher AF burden after ablation was associated with poorer AF-specific PROs and poorer generic physical but not mental health. Our results support the use of an AF-specific instrument, alone or in combination with a generic instrument, to assess the effect of ablation.