To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An effort to winding future nurses and physicians together: Students’ joint learning about wound management
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1110-0782
2014 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Background: Lack of physician-nurse collaboration in wound management may result in prolonged healing process for the patients (Apelqvist, 2012). In order to facilitate future professional collaboration interprofessional undergraduate learning activities has been proposed (Barr et al., 2005).

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate changes and characteristics of nursing and medical students’ attitudes towards each other’s future professions in relation to a joint learning activity in wound management. Methods Medical (n=40) and nursing (n=50) students were jointly trained in compression therapy, Doppler assessment and wound case studies. Students were measured by the Jefferson scale on attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration (Hojat, et al., 1999) and compared to previously gathered baseline scores. Focus group interviews were held to deepen the knowledge about characteristics of attitudes towards both the others’ profession and towards collaboration.

Results: Students scored high on the Jefferson scale in conjunction to the IPE activity. However, since also the baseline group scored high, no differences were detected after joint training. Preliminary analysis of qualitative data shows that medical students’ consider the nursing role as practically oriented with focus on the patients’ different needs of care, while nursing students sees the role of physicians as generation bound pointing to elderly physicians’ dominance and younger physicians’ flexibility but also to variations between organizational levels of care. Students experienced a lack of structural support for collaboration in their clinical practice. Interprofessional training was considered as important to gain insight into each other’s complementing knowledge area. Furthermore joint training was considered providing wider perspectives of patient care.

Implications: The joint learning activity provided new insight into the other profession’s competence, and was appreciated by the students. This kind of learning activity may increase future professional collaboration and thus improve wound management. Efforts should be made to find strategies for structures facilitating collaboration in clinical practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
NIPNET - Nordic Interprofessional Network , 2014.
Keywords [en]
Interprofessional Education, wound management
Keywords [sv]
Interprofessionellt lärande, sårutbildning
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-69831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-69831DiVA, id: diva2:1258515
Conference
Nordic Interprofessional Network Conference (NIPNET), Stockholm, Sweden, October 2-3, 2014
Available from: 2018-10-24 Created: 2018-10-24 Last updated: 2024-05-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Edelbring, Samuel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edelbring, Samuel
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 256 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf