To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Integrating virtual patients into courses: follow-up seminars and perceived benefit
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1110-0782
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Medical Education, ISSN 0308-0110, E-ISSN 1365-2923, Vol. 46, no 4, p. 417-425Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: The use of virtual patients (VPs) suggests promising effects on student learning. However, currently empirical data on how best to use VPs in practice are scarce. More knowledge is needed regarding aspects of integrating VPs into a course, of which student acceptance is one key issue. Several authors call for looking beyond technology to see VPs in relation to the course context. The follow-up seminar is proposed as an important aspect of integration that warrants investigation.

Methods: A cross-sectional explanatory study was performed in a clinical clerkship introduction course at four teaching hospitals affiliated to the same medical faculty. The VP-related activities were planned collaboratively by teachers from all four settings. However, each setting employed a different strategy to follow up the activity in the course. Sixteen questionnaire items were grouped into three scales pertaining to: perceived benefit of VPs; wish for more guidance on using VPs, and wish for assessment and feedback on VPs. Scale scores were compared across the four settings, which were ranked according to the level of intensity of students processing of cases during VP follow- up activities.

Results: The perceived benefit of VPs and their usage were higher in the two intense-use settings compared with the moderate-and lowintensity settings. The wish for more guidance was high in the low-and one of the highintensity settings. Students in all settings displayed little interest in more assessment and feedback regarding VPs.

Conclusions: High case processing intensity was related to positive perceptions of the benefit of VPs. However, the low interest in more assessment and feedback on the use of VPs indicates the need to clearly communicate the added value of the follow-up seminar. The findings suggest that a more intense follow-up pays off in terms of the benefit perceived by students. This study illustrates the need to consider VPs from the perspective of a holistic course design and not as isolated add‐ons.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2012. Vol. 46, no 4, p. 417-425
National Category
Pedagogical Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-69835DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04219.xISI: 000301570300013PubMedID: 22429178Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84858608337OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-69835DiVA, id: diva2:1258522
Note

Funding Agencies: EC

Available from: 2018-10-24 Created: 2018-10-24 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Edelbring, SamuelDahlgren, Lars Owe

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edelbring, SamuelDahlgren, Lars Owe
In the same journal
Medical Education
Pedagogical Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 277 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf