oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Winning or not losing?: The impact of non-pain goal focus on attentional bias to learned pain signals
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. (CHAMP)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9462-0256
Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, ISSN 1877-8860, E-ISSN 1877-8879, Vol. 18, no 4, p. 675-686Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aims: Insights into the nature of cognitive bias, including attentional bias to threat signals, are considered pivotal to understanding (chronic) pain and related distress. It has been put forward that attention to pain-related threat is normally dynamic and relates to the motivational state of the individual. In this experiment we aimed (i) to replicate the finding that attentional bias for pain signals in healthy participants can be reduced when a non-pain goal is pursued, and (ii) to extend this finding by taking into account the outcome focus of the non-pain goal. We hypothesised that the reduction in attentional bias for pain signals by concurrent non-pain goal pursuit would be stronger with non-pain prevention goals than with promotion goals.

Methods: Healthy university students performed an attentional bias task (i.e. spatial cueing task) containing visual cues that signalled the possible occurrence of a painful stimulus (electrocutaneous stimulus at tolerance level) or its absence, in combination with a non-pain goal task (i.e. digit naming task). The non-pain goal was either related to acquiring a positive outcome (gaining money depending on digit-naming performance; promotion goal group, n=31) or related to avoiding a negative outcome (losing money; prevention goal group, n=31). A standard attentional bias task served as the control condition (control group, n=31).

Results: Spatial cueing effects were larger for pain cues than for no-pain cues, indicating attentional bias for pain signals. The pattern of results suggests that this effect was indeed reduced in the goal groups as compared to the control group, but there was no significant group difference.

Conclusions: We found no statistically-significant evidence for the impact of non-pain goal pursuit or outcome focus on pain-related attentional bias. At best, there were indications of a reduced attentional bias for pain signals with non-pain goal pursuit that was either promotion- or prevention focused.

Implications: These data add to the small but growing body of literature on the assumed relevance of motivational context in explaining variations in attentional bias. The results trigger new questions on the nature and assessment of pain-related attentional bias, and more specifically attentional bias for fear-conditioned pain signals (versus safety signals), from a motivational perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Walter de Gruyter, 2018. Vol. 18, no 4, p. 675-686
Keywords [en]
attention, experimental pain, fear, fear conditioning, goal pursuit, motivation
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-69910DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0055ISI: 000451213600016PubMedID: 30074899Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85052680837OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-69910DiVA, id: diva2:1261135
Note

Funding Agencies:

NWO Social Sciences Research Council of The Netherlands  453-04-003 

"Asthenes" long-term structural funding Methusalem grant by Flemish Government, Belgium  

Örebro University, Sweden 

Available from: 2018-11-06 Created: 2018-11-06 Last updated: 2018-12-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Schrooten, Martien G. S.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schrooten, Martien G. S.
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf