To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does validation and alliance during the multimodal investigation affect patients' acceptance of chronic pain?: An experimental single case study
Pychosomatic Medicine Clinic, Region of Västmanland, Västerås, Sweden.
School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9429-9012
2019 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, ISSN 1877-8860, E-ISSN 1877-8879, Vol. 19, no 1, p. 73-82Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and aims: Among chronic pain patients who are referred to participation in a multimodal rehabilitation program (MMRP), pain catastrophizing and dysfunctional pain coping is common. In many cases it may have driven the patient to a range of unsuccessful searches for biomedical explanations and pain relief. Often these efforts have left patients feeling disappointed, hopeless and misunderstood. The MMRP process can be preceded by a multimodal investigation (MMI) where an important effort is to validate the patient to create a good alliance and begin a process of change towards acceptance of the pain. However, whether the MMI has such therapeutic effect is unclear. Using a repeated single case experimental design, the purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of MMI by studying changes in patients' experience of validation, alliance, acceptance of pain, coping, catastrophizing, and depression before and during the MMI process.

Methods: Participants were six chronic pain patients with high levels of pain catastrophizing (>25 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale) and risk for long term disability (>105 on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire) who were subjected to MMI before planned MMRP. For each patient, weekly self-report measures of validation, alliance and acceptance of pain were obtained during a 5-10-weeks baseline, before the MMI started. Subsequently, these measures were also obtained during a 6-8 weeks MMI process in order to enable comparative analyses. Additionally, pain coping, depression and pain catastrophizing were measured using standardized questionnaires before and after the MMI.

Results: Irrespective of experiences of validation and alliance before MMI, all six patients felt validated and experienced a good alliance during MMI. Acceptance of pain improved only in one patient during MMI. None of the patients showed clinically relevant improvement in pain coping, depression or catastrophizing after the MMI.

Conclusions: The patients did not change their acceptance and pain coping strategies despite of good alliance and experience of validation during the MMI process. Even if the design of this study precludes generalization to chronic pain patients in general, the results suggest that MMI may not have a therapeutic effect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Walter de Gruyter, 2019. Vol. 19, no 1, p. 73-82
Keywords [en]
assessment, chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain clinic, pain measurement, rehabilitation
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-70001DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0051ISI: 000455520700009PubMedID: 30375349Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85056261752OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-70001DiVA, id: diva2:1261258
Note

Funding Agency:

Region of Västmanland

Available from: 2018-11-06 Created: 2018-11-06 Last updated: 2022-08-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Psykologiska faktorer vid rehabilitering av patienter med långvarig smärta
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Psykologiska faktorer vid rehabilitering av patienter med långvarig smärta
2022 (Swedish)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Chronic pain is common and a burden for both the individual and society. In chronic pain, the pain has lost its function as a warning system and instead has become a disease in itself. Neurobiologically, several areas of the brain are involved, but to gain a broader understanding of the long-term pain, the biopsychosocial model is the best starting point. In line with thisand many scientific studies since the late 90's, psychological factors have proven to be an important factor in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Interdisciplinary multimodal rehabilitation programs (IMMRP) are the treatment currently given to patients with long-term pain in the specialized pain rehabilitation. When the IMMRP has been reviewed, patients have shown improvement over time, but it is not possible to say whether it is the IMMRP or which parts of the IMMRP that explain the improvement (1).

In this licentiate thesis, I have studied the importance of psychological factors in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain. This has been done in three studies reported in three published articles. All the studies have been close to the clinic and have been performed on patients in the specialized pain rehabilitation care in Sweden.

The first article studied the effect of the multimodal investigation (MMI). More specifically, it was investigated whether alliance building and feelings of validation in patients with chronic pain affected their acceptance of pain, pain management, catastrophic thoughts, and depression. This was performed in a "single case" study on six patients in MMI. The results showed that despite good alliance and sense of validation, acceptance increased only in one patient and no improvement was seen in pain management, catastrophizing, and depression.

In study two, subgroups of patients with chronic pain were studied. The subgroup analysis showed that patients referred for IMMRP could be divided into groups with different profiles regarding emotional problems and pain avoidance. These profiles were important for how the patients relatedto their pain and the results of IMMRP. The results of the study can increase the understanding of which patients should be selected for IMMRP and how the treatment can be adapted to the patients' needs.

In study three, opioid treatment in patients with long-term pain who were referred to IMMRP was studied. The result showed that opioid prescribing was common and 55% of the participants received at least one prescription for opioids during the two years after the first assessment. It also turns out that there was a connection between individual patient characteristics (especially pain and depressive symptoms) and opioid prescription. Understanding how individual patient characteristics relate to prescribing patterns and long-term opioid use is an important prerequisite for managing opioid prescribing and the basics for preventing overuse. Overall, this licentiate thesis shows that MMU has no therapeutic effect on patients with long-term pain. It also shows that patients with chronic pain are a heterogeneous group that can be divided into subgroups based on psychological characteristics. The subgroups, in turn, had different ways of managing their pain and absorbing the treatment offered. In addition, it emerged that opioid prescribing was common among patients with long-term pain and that there was a link between opioids and patient characteristics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2022. p. 85
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063
Keywords
chronic pain, rehabilitation, biopsychosocial, multidisciplinary pain clinic, SQRP, assessment, fear avoidance beliefs, opioids
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-100547 (URN)978-91-7529-453-7 (ISBN)
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-08-10 Created: 2022-08-10 Last updated: 2023-11-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Boersma, Katja

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Boersma, Katja
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 787 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf