oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Status of the Case-Law from the European Court of Human Rights in the National Legal Practice – a Question of the Local Legal Culture?: East-Scandinavian Comparisons
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2171-6580
2018 (English)In: Teisės apžvalga / Law review, E-ISSN 2029-4239, Vol. 18, no 2, p. 46-59Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Too often it has been taken for granted that East-Scandinavian countries, Finland and Sweden share similar societies, similar culture and even legal mentality. Very often there is a shared or similar jurisprudence, sometimes even identical single legal rules in Finland and Sweden due to the historical background, deep co-operation of Nordic legislators especially before the EU-memberships and because Finland has often copied the Swedish legislation. However, the interpretations and therefore the way of legal thinking varies between Finland and Sweden, in the other words, the legal culture in the neighboring countries are not identical. Swedish legislative culture is much more dialogic compared with the Finnish one. The Finnish way to “run things” instead of to discuss and reflect is the main difference between the Finnish and Swedish cultures of realizing things.

This might be one reason to the current difference that ECHR and case law based on it, is lively discussed by academics in Finland and easily followed by courts too, whereas this common law –based way of interpretation (the contents of the convention is developed by case-law and not amending the text) is not that familiar way to make legal changes in Sweden. Formally, the convention is valid and binding in both countries and that history is much longer in Sweden since 1959 whereas - mainly thanks to political reasons – Finland could join in the convention in the beginning of 90´s but the factual effects at least into the Finnish procedural law has been really enormous and very fundamental whereas in Sweden the ECHR and its article 6 are not the main factors in the procedural law.

In this article, the status of the case-law from the European court of human rights is compared with East-Scandinavian countries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lithuania: Vytautas Magnus University , 2018. Vol. 18, no 2, p. 46-59
Keywords [en]
Comparative studies, critical legal positivism, East-Scandinavian countries, European Court of Human Rights, fair trial, implementation of human right
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-70816DOI: 10.7220/2029-4239.18.2OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-70816DiVA, id: diva2:1272033
Available from: 2018-12-18 Created: 2018-12-18 Last updated: 2018-12-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Ervo, Laura

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ervo, Laura
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf