oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Interactive Audit System: 10 Years' Experience with an International Web-Based Clinical and Research Perioperative Care Database
Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, University of Edinburgh and Colorectal Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, ISSN 1531-0043, E-ISSN 1530-9681, Vol. 32, no 1, p. 75-81Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a managed care program that has shown the ability to reduce complications following elective colorectal surgery. In 2006, the ERAS (R) Society developed the ERAS (R) Interactive Audit System (EIAS), which has allowed centers in over 20 countries to enter perioperative patient data to benchmark against international practice within the audit system and act as a stimulus for quality improvement. The de-identified patient data are coded in SQL (a relational database), stored on secure servers, and data governance aspects have been secured in all involved countries. A collaborative approach is undertaken within involved units toward research questions with published cohort data from the audit system having demonstrated the importance of overall compliance on improving patient outcomes and less cost of care. The EIAS has shown that collaborative clinical effort can drive quality improvement in a short time frame in an international context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Thieme Medical Publishers, 2019. Vol. 32, no 1, p. 75-81
Keywords [en]
surgery, audit, perioperative care, outcomes
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-71678DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673357ISI: 000455134200013PubMedID: 30647549Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85059774143OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-71678DiVA, id: diva2:1281862
Available from: 2019-01-23 Created: 2019-01-23 Last updated: 2019-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Ljungqvist, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Gastroenterology and HepatologySurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf