The prediction of suicide in severe mental illness: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule (OxMIS)Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Translational Psychiatry, E-ISSN 2158-3188, Vol. 9, no 1, article id 98Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Assessment of suicide risk in individuals with severe mental illness is currently inconsistent, and based on clinical decision-making with or without tools developed for other purposes. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for suicide using data from linked population-based registers in individuals with severe mental illness. A national cohort of 75,158 Swedish individuals aged 15-65 with a diagnosis of severe mental illness (schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder) with 574,018 clinical patient episodes between 2001 and 2008, split into development (58,771 patients, 494 suicides) and external validation (16,387 patients, 139 suicides) samples. A multivariable derivation model was developed to determine the strength of pre-specified routinely collected socio-demographic and clinical risk factors, and then tested in external validation. We measured discrimination and calibration for prediction of suicide at 1 year using specified risk cut-offs. A 17-item clinical risk prediction model for suicide was developed and showed moderately good measures of discrimination (c-index 0.71) and calibration. For risk of suicide at 1 year, using a pre-specified 1% cut-off, sensitivity was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47-63%) and specificity was 75% (95% CI 74-75%). Positive and negative predictive values were 2% and 99%, respectively. The model was used to generate a simple freely available web-based probability-based risk calculator (Oxford Mental Illness and Suicide tool or OxMIS) without categorical cut-offs. A scalable prediction score for suicide in individuals with severe mental illness is feasible. If validated in other samples and linked to effective interventions, using a probability score may assist clinical decision-making.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Publishing Group, 2019. Vol. 9, no 1, article id 98
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-72880DOI: 10.1038/s41398-019-0428-3ISI: 000459835800001PubMedID: 30804323Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85062068405OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-72880DiVA, id: diva2:1293257
Funder
Wellcome trust, 202836/Z/16/ZSwedish Research Council2019-03-042019-03-042024-01-17Bibliographically approved