To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on gastric insufflation during induction of anaesthesia when using pressure-controlled ventilation via a face mask: A randomised controlled trial
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Västerås, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. (Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics)
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: European Journal of Anaesthesiology, ISSN 0265-0215, E-ISSN 1365-2346, Vol. 36, no 9, p. 625-632Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Face mask ventilation (FMV) during induction of anaesthesia is associated with risk of gastric insufflation that may lead to gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. A continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to reduce gastric regurgitation. We therefore hypothesised that CPAP followed by FMV with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during induction of anaesthesia would reduce the risk of gastric insufflation.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to compare the incidence of gastric insufflation during FMV with a fixed PEEP level or zero PEEP (ZEEP) after anaesthesia induction. A secondary aim was to investigate the effects of FMV with or without PEEP on upper oesophageal sphincter (UES), oesophageal body and lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressures.

DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial.

SETTING: Single centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS: Thirty healthy volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS: Pre-oxygenation without or with CPAP 10 cmH2O, followed by pressure-controlled FMV with either ZEEP or PEEP 10 cmH2O after anaesthesia induction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A combined impedance/manometry catheter was used to detect the presence of gas and to measure oesophageal pressures. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of gastric insufflation, defined as a sudden anterograde increase in impedance of more than 1 kΩ over the LES. Secondary outcome measures were UES, oesophageal body and LES pressures.

RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of gastric insufflation related to peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), was significantly higher in the PEEP group compared with the ZEEP group (log-rank test P < 0.01). When PIP reached 30 cmH2O, 13 out of 15 in the PEEP group compared with five out of 15 had shown gastric insufflation. There was a significant reduction of oesophageal sphincter pressures within groups comparing pre-oxygenation to after anaesthesia induction, but there were no significant differences in oesophageal sphincter pressures related to the level of PEEP.

CONCLUSION: Contrary to the primary hypothesis, with increasing PIP the tested PEEP level did not protect against but facilitated gastric insufflation during FMV. This result suggests that PEEP should be used with caution after anaesthesia induction during FMV, whereas CPAP during pre-oxygenation seems to be safe.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02238691.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Science Ltd. , 2019. Vol. 36, no 9, p. 625-632
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-74367DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001016ISI: 000501821900002PubMedID: 31116114Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85070851905OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-74367DiVA, id: diva2:1317627
Note

Funding Agency:

Medical Research Fund, Örebro County Council, Örebro, Sweden 

Available from: 2019-05-23 Created: 2019-05-23 Last updated: 2023-04-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Risk of pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia and sedation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Risk of pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia and sedation
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Pulmonary aspiration is a feared complication in anesthesia practice. Even if it is a rare event it is the most common cause of anesthesia related death. There are two different types of pulmonary aspiration, macroaspirationwhere large amounts of gastric content are inhaled to the lungs, and the silent, often unnoticed, microaspiration, where small amounts of gastric or oropharyngeal contents are aspirated. Micro aspirations is much more common and can occur at any time during the perioperative period, presenting as postoperative pulmonary complications, often several days after the anesthesia procedure. 

Human physiology features multiple mechanisms of protection against pulmonary aspiration, including the esophageal sphincters that prevent gastric regurgitation and complex laryngeal reflex systems protecting the airway. An additional vital defense against pulmonary aspiration is an intact swallowing function, with dysphagia being the primary cause of aspiration pneumonia. Anesthetic agents affect these protective mechanisms to various extent.

The aim of this thesis was to study the effects of sedative agents on swallowing function, and different ventilatory techniques during anesthesia induction in healthy volunteers. In study I, the use of positive end expiratory pressure during mask ventilation after anesthesia induction was studied in regard of risk of gastric insufflation. In study II and IV the pharmacological effects of the opioid remifentanil on swallowing function were studied. Study III was the first study on effects of dexmedetomidine on human swallowing physiology. The experiments in this thesis has led to a deeper understanding in how different anesthetic agents affects the physiological protective mechanisms against pulmonary aspiration, both during anesthesia induction and sedation. The findings may facilitate clinical decisions, leading to better risk management in terms of macroaspiration during anesthesia and sedation, and postoperative pulmonary complications related to microaspirations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2023. p. 72
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 277
Keywords
Pulmonary aspiration, face-mask ventilation, anesthesia induction, high resolution impedance manometry, procedural sedation, remifentanil, dexmedetomidine, swallowing physiology
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-104355 (URN)9789175294957 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-05-12, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, hörsal X1, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-02-20 Created: 2023-02-20 Last updated: 2023-04-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Cajander, PerAhlstrand, Rebecca

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cajander, PerAhlstrand, Rebecca
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 395 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf