To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Final report of key comparison CCM.P-K12 for very low helium flow rates (leak rates)
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany.
National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ, AIST), Tsukuba Central 3, Umezono 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany.
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1359-3311
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Metrologia, ISSN 0026-1394, E-ISSN 1681-7575, Vol. 50, no Suppl., article id 07001Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Quantitative leak tests with vacuum technology have become an important tool in industry for safety and operational reasons and to meet environmental regulations. In the absence of a relevant key comparison, so far, there are no calibration measurement capabilities published in the BIPM data base. To enable national metrology institutes providing service for leak rate calibrations to apply for these entries in the data base and to ensure international equivalence in this field, key comparison CCM.P-K12 was organized. The goal of this comparison was to compare the national calibration standards and procedures for helium leak rates. Two helium permeation leak elements of 4×10−11 mol/s (L1) and 8×10−14 mol/s (L2) served as transfer standards and were measured by 11 national metrology institutes for L1 and 6 national metrology institutes for L2. Equivalence could be shown for 8 laboratories in the case of L1 and for all 6 in the case of L2. Three different evaluation methods were applied and are presented in this report, but the random effects model was accepted as most suitable in our case.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing Ltd. , 2013. Vol. 50, no Suppl., article id 07001
Keywords [en]
Metrology, Thermometry metrology, Standards, Calibration services and Reference materials
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76727DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/1A/07001ISI: 000330832200041OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-76727DiVA, id: diva2:1354217
Note

Published in Technical supplement. 

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Available from: 2019-09-24 Created: 2019-09-24 Last updated: 2019-10-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Bodnar, Olha

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bodnar, Olha
In the same journal
Metrologia
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 175 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf