oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Det offentliga samtalet: En argumentationsanalys av artikuleringen kring Kristianstad Arena
Örebro University, Department of Social and Political Sciences.
2008 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Essay in Political Science C by Peter Nilsson, spring 2008.

Det offentliga samtalet – en argumentationsanalys av artikuleringen kring Kristianstad Arena

Tutor: Stig Montin

The purpose of this essay is to examine the public deliberation of Kristianstad Arena in the local newspaper and clarify who the actors are and what kind of arguments they express. Further I intend to find the differences between the actors and the kind of arguments they use. To fulfill the purpose I’ve used three minor questions which are; a) which actors participate in the public deliberation about Kristianstad Arena, b) Which are the arguments emerge, c) Which clear differences in the arguments is there between the actors? To find my answers I’ve examined the local paper during a period of four months. The tool I’ve been using to analyze the arguments has its origin in Toulmin’s model from 1958. The conclusion of the essay is that the public deliberation involves seven different kind of actors, who express’s three different kind of arguments. The actors are private persons, politicians, politically un-attached thinkers, politically attached thinkers, local business world, sports associations and media. The three types of arguments are about, the decision, the arena and the debate. The private persons and the politicians resemble each other and mainly express arguments about the decision and partly about the arena. The politically attached and un-attached thinkers more or less exclusively express arguments about the decision. The local business has an equal share of decision- and arena arguments, while the media and the sport associations mainly express arguments about the debate and the arena.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 41 p.
Keyword [sv]
Offentligt samtal, Arenapolitik
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-2359ISRN: ORU-SAM/STK-C--08/0052--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-2359DiVA: diva2:136154
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2008-06-23 Created: 2008-06-23

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(258 kB)538 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 258 kBChecksum MD5
fe0b3aa7cadc49422ee29ba20a1cde7099021f1362ceaa9a2559dfbe0d79ff8a6179e68c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social and Political Sciences
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 538 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 498 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf