oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nonresponse bias for some common estimators and its change over time in the data collection process
Örebro University, Swedish Business School at Örebro University.
2004 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In most surveys, the risk of nonresponse is a factor taken into account at the planning stage. Commonly, resources are set aside for a follow-up procedure which aims at reducing the nonresponse rate. However, we should pay attention to the effect of nonresponse, rather than the nonresponse rate itself.

When considering nonresponse error, i.e. bias and variance, it is not obvious that the resources spent on nonresponse rate reduction efforts are time and money well spent. In this paper we address this issue, focusing on the effect of follow-ups on nonresponse bias. The nonresponse biases for some common estimators are derived, and the change in bias for these estimators is studied under a setup that allows us to take into account the data collection process, and follow-up efforts in particular.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet , 2004. no 13, p. 37p. 37-
Series
ESI Working Paper Series ; 2004:13
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-3023OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-3023DiVA, id: diva2:136434
Available from: 2008-11-03 Created: 2008-11-03 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Cost efficency of nonresponse rate reduction efforts: an evaluation approach
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Cost efficency of nonresponse rate reduction efforts: an evaluation approach
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Nonresponse, the failure to obtain complete measurement on all sample elements, is an increasing problem in sample surveys. Efforts to reduce the nonresponse rate are expensive and their effect may not be as desired. To allocate the limited resources to where they achieve the most error reduction, it is important to consider the cost-efficiency of efforts. This thesis proposes an approach to evaluate the cost-efficiency of the nonresponse rate reduction efforts for a general survey setup, assuming a direct element sampling design. A theoretical framework, under which both the error and the cost can be evaluated, is introduced. The framework extends the existing notion of response probabilities as fixed quantities by introducing a sequence of response probabilities, taking into account the actions and efforts taken by the survey administration during the data collection period.

In addition to the introductory part, the thesis consists of four papers. In the first paper, the basic theoretical framework for evaluation is developed and expressions for the nonresponse bias of some common reweighting estimators are derived under this framework. Furthermore, expressions for the bias difference are given, general expressions as well as expressions under different specific scenarios. In the second paper, expressions of the total variance are derived for the same estimators and under the same framework as in the first paper. In the third paper, the basic theoretical framework in the first two papers is extended to incorporate survey costs, and a cost efficiency evaluation approach is introduced for an ideal situation where all required quantities are known. The approach consists of three steps, involving pairwise comparisons of cost-efficiency for time points during the data collection period and evaluation of point estimator bias and variance. Two different measures of the cost efficiency are proposed and compared, theoretically and through a small numerical study. In the fourth paper, the evaluation approach is extended to situations that may occur in practice. In the more favorable situations considered, unknown quantities are estimated through Monte Carlo simulations.Simulations are also used in the cases where unverifiable assumptions must be made about unknown quantities, as this facilitates comparisons of the effect on conclusions under different assumptions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2008. p. 27
Series
Örebro Studies in Statistics, ISSN 1651-8608 ; 3
Keywords
nonresponse bias, follow-ups, response distribution, resource allocation, cost efficiency, evaluation, nonresponse error, Monte Carlo simulations
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Statistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-2588 (URN)978-91-7668-641-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-12-18, Bion, Forumhuset, Fakultetsgatan, Örebro, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2008-11-03 Created: 2008-11-03 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://swopec.hhs.se/oruesi/abs/oruesi2004_013.htm
By organisation
Swedish Business School at Örebro University
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf