oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hälsoarbetets möte med skolan i teori och praktik
Örebro University, Department of Education.
2003 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of the thesis is to investigate whether, and if so how, schools can be developed in a way that foregrounds a greater awareness of their role in the promotion of health.

This thesis is about how the school itself, that is to say everything that can be subsumed within the notion of education, can promote health. The conclusions that can be drawn from the literature review can be summarised as follows: "poor health inhibits learning" and "poor learning inhibits health". Based on empirical investigations of health promotional projects in schools, pictures of both schools and related health promotion projects emerge.

Health promotion work ranges in extent from traditional dissemination of knowledge about health to methods for establishing dialogues in everyday work and about democratic issues. Health promotion practice is close to, and can even be confused with, activities for school development. Health promotion work can equally well be used as a tool in school development strategies. Training in conducting dialogues between different categories of staff and between students and teachers can function as one such tool. One precondition for such an encounter to take place, however, is that a broad and non-traditional concept of health is used.

Health promotion work can be understood as one amongst a number of democratic strategies. When focusing on participation and democracy, health promotion work and school development become proximate to one another, despite the fact that they adopt different approaches and perspectives when looking at the same area or problem. Drawing on Foucault, however, health promotion work and school development can either be understood as a way of manipulating and disciplining "low income children" or, alternatively, as a means of empowerment, participation, development of "voice" and deliberation. There is thus an extensive field for further research and a number of examples, are presented. Drawing on the work of Richardson, "writing" is my main interpretative strategy for understanding both the literature and the empirical data. My work is also informed by a "problem-based methodology" based on that developed initially by Robinson.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitetsbibliotek , 2003. , p. 265
Series
Örebro Studies in Education, ISSN 1404-9570 ; 7
Keywords [en]
health promotion, health education, health promoting schools, school development, salutogenic model, empowerment, student participation, democracy, on, democracy, writing, dialogue, pedagogik
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-46ISBN: 91-7668-337-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-46DiVA, id: diva2:136825
Public defence
2003-04-29, Hörsal P, Prismahuset, 13:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2003-04-29 Created: 2003-04-29 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Department of Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1555 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf