To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Leisure in adolescence: youths' activity choices and why they are linked to problems for some and not others
Örebro University, Department of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences.
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Adolescents spend a great amount of time engaged in different leisure activities. Some of the activity choices they make can put them at risk for negative socialization. In particular, peer-oriented, unstructured activities such as hanging out on the streets or at neighborhood recreation centers have been linked to problem development. This dissertation examined these choices and their consequences. I had four main aims. The first was to examine whether attending youth recreation centers is linked to normbreaking for girls as it is for boys. The results from Studies I and II show that it is. The second aim was to examine why youths gravitate to peer-oriented, unstructured contexts. Study II tested ideas involving family and personality. Concerning family, the idea was that youths who have negative experiences associated with the adult-led family context will gravitate towards leisure contexts that are characterized by the absence of adults. Concerning personality, the idea was that youths high in personality characteristics such as impulsivity and thrill-seeking will be attracted to unstructured leisure contexts that lack adult influence. Both of these ideas were supported (Study II). The third aim of this dissertation concerned moving from structured to unstructured activities. The question was why some youths stay in structured activities whereas others move to unstructured activities. Study III tested ideas involving family and peers. Concerning family, the idea was that youths with negative experiences at home will gravitate away from structured contexts and towards unstructured contexts. The findings in Study III were consistent with this idea. The other idea was that youths gravitate to their peers over time—youths whose peers are in structured activities will stay involved over time whereas those whose peers are not in structured activities will move away from structured activities. The results of Study III supported this idea. Thus, concerning why youths move away from structured activities, Study III suggests that both parents and peers play roles. The final aim of this dissertation was to examine potential explanations why peer-oriented, unstructured contexts are linked to problems for some youths but not others. The results from Studies I and II suggest that peer socialization is important. Girls who attended youth recreation centers and were involved with peers and boys were particularly high in normbreaking. These results held when controlling for negative experiences at home and personality characteristics (Study II). The results of Study III suggest that family relationships are important. Youths with close family ties were less prone to delinquency even if they started loitering on the streets. Thus, parents and peers both seem to be involved in whether peer-oriented, unstructured contexts are linked to problems. Overall, these studies have revealed much about the mechanisms involved in leisure context choices and why they are linked to problem behavior. The lessons to be learned are that to understand the choices youths make about their leisure time and the consequences of those choices, it is fruitful to apply a broader perceptive and consider both the youths’ own characteristics and the social world surrounding them.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitetsbibliotek , 2006. , p. 73
Series
Örebro Studies in Psychology, ISSN 1651-1328 ; 10
Keywords [en]
structured activities, unstructured activities, extracurricular activities, youth centers, parent relations, peer relations, delinquency
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-790ISBN: 91-7668-510-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-790DiVA, id: diva2:137282
Public defence
2006-12-11, HSM, Musikhögskolan, Örebro universitet, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 13:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2006-11-20 Created: 2006-11-20 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Explaining why a leisure context is bad for some girls and not for others
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Explaining why a leisure context is bad for some girls and not for others
Show others...
2005 (English)In: Organized activities as contexts of development: extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs / [ed] Joseph L. Mahoney, Reed W. Larson, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum , 2005, p. 211-234Chapter in book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-3191 (URN)978-0-8058-4430-6 (ISBN)
Available from: 2006-11-20 Created: 2006-11-20 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved
2. Why a leisure context is linked to normbreaking for some girls and not others: personality characteristics and parent–child relations as explanations
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Why a leisure context is linked to normbreaking for some girls and not others: personality characteristics and parent–child relations as explanations
2004 (English)In: Journal of Adolescence, ISSN 0140-1971, E-ISSN 1095-9254, Vol. 27, no 5, p. 583-598Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In a study of adolescents in the 1970s, girls were high in normbreaking if they attended youth recreation centers and were heavily involved with peers or boys (Stattin et al., 2003). The present study investigated whether these results could be replicated on a modern sample, and then examined parent–child relationships and personality characteristics as explanations why some girls and not others go to the youth centers and become heavily involved with peers and boys. Participants were 1279 14-year olds from a city in central Sweden. The results showed that personality characteristics and experiences at home partly explained youth center attendance, and personality characteristics partly explained involvement with boys, but neither explained why those who attended the centers and were involved with boys were highest on normbreaking. Thus, personality characteristics and experiences at home seem to be involved when girls choose the youth center context, but socialization by peers at the centers might better explain normbreaking among center goers.

National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-3192 (URN)10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.008 (DOI)000224667700007 ()2-s2.0-4844228654 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2006-11-20 Created: 2006-11-20 Last updated: 2023-12-08Bibliographically approved
3. Staying in or moving away from structured activities: explanations involving parents and peers
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Staying in or moving away from structured activities: explanations involving parents and peers
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-3193 (URN)
Available from: 2006-11-20 Created: 2006-11-20 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Persson, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Andreas
By organisation
Department of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2699 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf