To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do screening and a randomized brief intervention at a Level 1 trauma center impact acute stress reactions to prevent later development of posttraumatic stress disorder?
School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, United States.
Dell Seton Medical Center, University of Texas, Austin TX, United States.
School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, United States.
Dell Seton Medical Center, University of Texas, Austin TX, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, ISSN 2163-0755, E-ISSN 2163-0763, Vol. 85, no 3, p. 466-475Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% to 40% of trauma survivors experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma reports that early screening and referral has the potential to improve outcomes and that further study of screening and intervention for PTSD would be beneficial. This prospective randomized study screened hospitalized patients for traumatic stress reactions and assessed the effect of a brief intervention in reducing later development of PTSD.

METHODS: The Primary Care PTSD (PC-PTSD) screen was administered to admitted patients. Patients with symptoms were randomized to an intervention or control group. The brief intervention focused on symptom education and normalization, coping strategies, and utilizing supports. The control group received a 3-minute educational brochure review. Both groups completed in-hospital interviews, then 45- and 90-day telephone interviews. Follow-up collected the PTSD checklist-civilian (PCL-C) assessment and qualitative data on treatment-seeking barriers.

RESULTS: The PC-PTSD screen was successful in predicting later PTSD symptoms at both 45 days ( = 0.43, p < 0.001) and 90 days ( = 0.37, p < 0.001) even after accounting for depression. Correlations of the intervention with the PCL-C scores and factor score estimates did not reach statistical significance at either time point (p = 0.827; p = 0.838), indicating that the brief intervention did not decrease PTSD symptoms over time. Of those at or above the PCL-C cutoff at follow-ups, a minority had sought treatment for their symptoms (43.2%). Primary barriers included focusing on their injury or ongoing rehabilitation, financial concerns, or location of residence.

CONCLUSION: The PC-PTSD screen identified patients who later assess positive for PTSD using the PCL-C. The brief intervention did not reduce 45- and 90-day PTSD development. Follow-up interviews revealed lack of treatment infrastructure in the community. It will be important for trauma centers to align with community resources to address the treatment needs of at-risk patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2018. Vol. 85, no 3, p. 466-475
Keywords [en]
Trauma, brief intervention, PTSD development
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78655DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001977ISI: 000443539800005PubMedID: 29787532Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85052746808OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-78655DiVA, id: diva2:1378940
Note

Funding Agencies:

Seton Healthcare Family-University of Texas at Austin Center for Health and Social Policy (CHASP)  

University of Texas System Patient Safety Committee 

Available from: 2019-12-16 Created: 2019-12-16 Last updated: 2019-12-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kramer, Mark

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kramer, Mark
In the same journal
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 104 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf