To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sunscreen use: controversies, challenges and regulatory aspects
Eviderm Institute AB, Solna, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: British Journal of Dermatology, ISSN 0007-0963, E-ISSN 1365-2133, Vol. 165, no 2, p. 255-262Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Mismatches between skin pigmentation and modern lifestyle continue to challenge our naked skin. One of our responses to these challenges is the development and use of sunscreens. The management of sunscreens has to balance their protective effect against erythema, photocarcinogenesis and photoageing owing to the potential toxicity of the ultraviolet (UV) filters for humans and the environment. The protection against UV radiation offered by sunscreens was recently standardized in the European Union (EU) based on international harmonization of measurement techniques. Four different categories of sun protection have been implemented along with recommendations on how to use sunscreen products in order to obtain the labelled protection. The UV filters in sunscreens have long been authorized for use by the EU authority on the basis of data from studies on acute toxicity, subchronic and chronic toxicity, reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, photogenotoxicity, carcinogenicity, irritation, sensitization, phototoxicity and photosensitization as well as on environmental aspects. New challenges with respect to the safety of UV filters have arisen from the banning of animal experiments for the development of cosmetics. Future debates on sunscreens are likely to focus on nanoparticles and environmental issues, along with motivation campaigns to persuade consumers to protect their skin. However, more efficient sunscreen use will also continue to raise questions on the benefit in preventing vitamin D synthesis in the skin induced by sunlight.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2011. Vol. 165, no 2, p. 255-262
National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78436DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10298.xISI: 000292926900007PubMedID: 21410663Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-79960620581OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-78436DiVA, id: diva2:1380566
Note

Funding Agency:

ACO Hud Nordic AB, Sweden  

Available from: 2019-12-19 Created: 2019-12-19 Last updated: 2020-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wiegleb Edström, Desirée

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wiegleb Edström, Desirée
In the same journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 367 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf