To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Internet-vs. group-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Pain and Rehabilitation Center, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Behaviour Research and Therapy, ISSN 0005-7967, E-ISSN 1873-622X, Vol. 70, p. 47-55Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to compare guided Internet-delivered to group-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for insomnia. We conducted an 8-week randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 6-months follow-up. Participants were forty-eight adults with insomnia, recruited via media. Interventions were guided Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) and group-delivered CBT (GCBT) for insomnia. Primary outcome measure was the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), secondary outcome measures were sleep diary data, depressive symptoms, response- and remission rates. Both treatment groups showed significant improvements and large effect sizes for ISI (Within Cohen's d: ICBT post = 1.8, 6-months follow-up = 2.1; GCBT post = 2.1, 6-months follow-up = 2.2). Confidence interval of the difference between groups posttreatment and at FU6 indicated non-inferiority of ICBT compared to GCBT. At post-treatment, two thirds of patients in both groups were considered responders (ISI-reduction > 7p). Using diagnostic criteria, 63% (ICBT) and 75% (GCBT) were in remission. Sleep diary data showed moderate to large effect sizes. We conclude that both guided Internet-CBT and group-CBT in this study were efficacious with regard to insomnia severity, sleep parameters and depressive symptoms. The results are in line with previous research, and strengthen the evidence for guided Internet-CBT for insomnia.

Trial registration: The study protocol was approved by, and registered with, the regional ethics review board in Linkoping, Sweden, registration number 2010/385-31.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2015. Vol. 70, p. 47-55
Keywords [en]
CBT, Insomnia, Internet, Non-inferiority, Group therapy, Psychotherapy
National Category
Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78084DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.002ISI: 000356552200006PubMedID: 25981329Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84929190380OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-78084DiVA, id: diva2:1387625
Funder
Stockholm County CouncilThe Karolinska Institutet's Research Foundation
Note

Funding Agency:

Linköping University

Available from: 2020-01-22 Created: 2020-01-22 Last updated: 2024-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusInternet-vs. group-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia

Authority records

Hesser, Hugo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hesser, Hugo
In the same journal
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 173 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf