To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Trauma Providers' Knowledge, Views, and Practice of Trauma-Informed Care
Penn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania; Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia; Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses, ISSN 1078-7496, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 131-138Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Trauma-informed interventions have been implemented in various settings, but trauma-informed care (TIC) has not been widely incorporated into the treatment of adult patients with traumatic injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine health care provider knowledge, attitudes, practices, competence, and perceived barriers to implementation of TIC. This cross-sectional study used an anonymous web-based survey to assess attitudes, knowledge, perceived competence, and practice of TIC among trauma providers from an urban academic medical center with a regional resource trauma center. Providers (nurses, physicians, therapists [physical, occupational, respiratory]) working in trauma resuscitation, trauma critical care, and trauma care units were recruited. Descriptive statistics summarized knowledge, attitudes, practice, competence, and perceived barriers to TIC and logistic regression analyses examined factors predicting the use of TIC in practice. Of 147 participants, the majority were nurses (65%), followed by therapists (18%) and physicians (17%), with a median 3 years of experience; 75% answered the knowledge items correctly and 89% held favorable opinions about TIC. Nineteen percent rated themselves as less than "somewhat competent." All participants rated the following as significant barriers to providing basic TIC: time constraints, need of training, confusing information about TIC, and worry about retraumatizing patients. Self-rated competence was the most consistent predictor of providers' reported use of specific TIC practices. Despite some variability, providers were generally knowledgeable and held favorable views toward incorporating TIC into their practice. TIC training for trauma providers is needed and should aim to build providers' perceived competence in providing TIC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2018. Vol. 25, no 2, p. 131-138
Keywords [en]
Acute stress disorder, Family, Nurses, Physicians, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Psycho-social aspects of care, Trauma care, Trauma providers' practice, Wounds and injuries
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-79638DOI: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000356ISI: 000436032500011PubMedID: 29521782Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85045542351OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-79638DiVA, id: diva2:1390100
Note

This study was funded in part by the Penn Injury Science Center and the Centers for Disease Control (grant no. R49CE002474).

Available from: 2020-01-31 Created: 2020-01-31 Last updated: 2020-10-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusFull text at PubMed Central

Authority records

Sluys, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sluys, Kerstin
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 221 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf