To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Missing Out on the Parenthood Bonus?: Voluntarily Childless in a “Child-friendly” Society
Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5171-2783
FoU Södertörn, Tumba, Sweden.
2016 (English)In: Journal of Family and Economic Issues, ISSN 1058-0476, E-ISSN 1573-3475, Vol. 37, no 4, p. 540-552Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article draws on interviews with Swedish voluntarily childless women and men in order to discuss their understandings of living in a so-called “child-friendly” welfare society where social policies subsidize families with children. Previous research from Anglo-Saxon countries implies that the social, political and economical interests of the voluntarily childless are in conflict with the interests of parents and that state subsidies and policies in support of parents could be considered as discrimination of childless people. However, in contrast to this previous research, the interviewees did not object to the redistributive tax system that benefits parents or to the political ambition to build a “child-friendly” labour market where it is possible to reconcile work with parenthood. Instead they defended themselves against accusations for being “free-riders” who did not contribute to society by referring to the responsibility they took by paying high taxes. Notwithstanding, the informants criticized how some parents misused their benefits and cashed in on them, making the voluntarily childless feel exploited. The article also suggests that state subsidies can eliminate some motives for voluntary childlessness but not all of them. The results add nuances to previous research as they highlight the importance of further investigating the relations between parents and non-parents in a social and political context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016. Vol. 37, no 4, p. 540-552
Keywords [en]
Voluntary childlessness, Parenthood bonus, Social policies, Sweden, Redistributive tax system, Workplace policies
National Category
Sociology Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-80120DOI: 10.1007/s10834-015-9474-zISI: 000387327700003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84946962769OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-80120DiVA, id: diva2:1395188
Available from: 2020-02-21 Created: 2020-02-21 Last updated: 2020-02-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Peterson, Helen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Peterson, Helen
In the same journal
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
SociologyGender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 214 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf