To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing of INR in acute stroke
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3845-8100
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Coagulation Research, Institute for Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden .
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Neurology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
2018 (English)In: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6314, E-ISSN 1600-0404, Vol. 137, no 2, p. 252-255Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Effective anticoagulant therapy is a contraindication to thrombolysis, which is an effective treatment of ischemic stroke if given within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. INR above 1.7 is generally considered a contraindication for thrombolysis. Rapid measurement of INR in warfarin-treated patients is therefore of major importance in order to be able to decide on thrombolysis or not. We asked whether INR measured on a point-of-care instrument would be as good as a central laboratory instrument.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 529 consecutive patients who arrived at the emergency department at a large urban teaching hospital with stroke symptoms were enrolled in the study. INR was measured with a CoaguChek and a Sysmex instrument. Basic clinical information such as age, sex, and diagnosis (if available) was recorded. INR from the instruments was compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS:  = 0.97). In the current setting, CoaguChek was in median 63 minutes faster than Sysmex.

CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that point-of-care testing is a safe mean to rapidly acquire a patient's INR value in acute clinical situations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard Forlag, 2018. Vol. 137, no 2, p. 252-255
Keywords [en]
International normalized ratio, point-of-care systems, stroke, thrombolytic therapy, warfarin
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Neurosciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-80573DOI: 10.1111/ane.12860ISI: 000419583500015PubMedID: 29068041Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85032206374OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-80573DiVA, id: diva2:1414157
Available from: 2020-03-12 Created: 2020-03-12 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

von Euler, Mia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Euler, Mia
In the same journal
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Medical and Health SciencesNeurosciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 164 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf