Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing of INR in acute stroke
2018 (English)In: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6314, E-ISSN 1600-0404, Vol. 137, no 2, p. 252-255Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
OBJECTIVES: Effective anticoagulant therapy is a contraindication to thrombolysis, which is an effective treatment of ischemic stroke if given within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. INR above 1.7 is generally considered a contraindication for thrombolysis. Rapid measurement of INR in warfarin-treated patients is therefore of major importance in order to be able to decide on thrombolysis or not. We asked whether INR measured on a point-of-care instrument would be as good as a central laboratory instrument.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 529 consecutive patients who arrived at the emergency department at a large urban teaching hospital with stroke symptoms were enrolled in the study. INR was measured with a CoaguChek and a Sysmex instrument. Basic clinical information such as age, sex, and diagnosis (if available) was recorded. INR from the instruments was compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman plot.
RESULTS: = 0.97). In the current setting, CoaguChek was in median 63 minutes faster than Sysmex.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that point-of-care testing is a safe mean to rapidly acquire a patient's INR value in acute clinical situations.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard Forlag, 2018. Vol. 137, no 2, p. 252-255
Keywords [en]
International normalized ratio, point-of-care systems, stroke, thrombolytic therapy, warfarin
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Neurosciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-80573DOI: 10.1111/ane.12860ISI: 000419583500015PubMedID: 29068041Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85032206374OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-80573DiVA, id: diva2:1414157
2020-03-122020-03-122024-01-02Bibliographically approved