To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does patient's sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians: a qualitative study
Department of Medicine, Solna Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Healthcare Development, The Health and Medical Care Administration, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Centre for Gender Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Gender Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet Stroke Research Network at Södersjukhuset Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Gender Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet Stroke Research Network at Södersjukhuset Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3845-8100
Department of Medicine, Solna Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Healthcare Development, The Health and Medical Care Administration, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BMC Family Practice, E-ISSN 1471-2296, Vol. 16, article id 137Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Biological and sociocultural differences between men and women may play an important role in medical treatment. Little is known about the awareness of these differences among general practitioners (GPs) and if they consider such differences in their medical practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' perception of sex and gender aspects in medical treatment.

METHODS: We conducted five focus group discussions (FGDs) with 29 physicians (mainly GPs) in Sweden. A discussion guide with semi-structured questions was used. All FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed word-by-word. Data were analysed through inductive thematic analysis with no predetermined categories.

RESULTS: Three main categories emerged from the data. The first category emphasised GPs' experiences of sex and gender differences in diagnosing and assessment of clinical findings. Medical treatment in men and women was central in the second category. The third category emphasised GPs' knowledge of sex differences in drug therapy.

CONCLUSIONS: The GPs stated they had little knowledge of sex and gender differences in drug treatment, but gave multiple examples of how the patient's sex affects the choice of treatment. Sex and gender aspects were considered in diagnosing and in the treatment decision. However, once the decision to treat was made the choice of drug followed recommendations by local Drug and Therapeutics Committee, which were perceived to be evidence-based. In the analysis we found a gap between perceived and expressed knowledge of sex and gender differences in drug treatment indicating a need of education about this to be included in the curriculum in medical school and in basic and specialist training for physicians. Education could also be a tool to avoid stereotypical thinking about male and female patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, UK: BioMed Central, 2015. Vol. 16, article id 137
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Social and Clinical Pharmacy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-80731DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0351-5ISI: 000362705400003PubMedID: 26462960Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84945242618OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-80731DiVA, id: diva2:1415582
Available from: 2020-03-19 Created: 2020-03-19 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

von Euler, Mia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Euler, Mia
In the same journal
BMC Family Practice
Medical and Health SciencesSocial and Clinical Pharmacy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 169 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf