oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sugardating utifrån ett åklagarperspektiv och polisiärt perspektiv: Skillnader och likheter utifrån yrkesroller
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
2020 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Studiens syfte var att ta reda på om det finns skillnader och/eller likheter mellan åklagares och polisers uppfattningar gällande sugardating. Studien ämnade också att ta reda på om sugardating som koncept bör eller inte bör omfattas av lagen om, köp av sexuell tjänst utifrån dess kriminaliseringsgrunder, samt om sugardating kan vara en inkörsport till prostitution. Studien hade en kvalitativ ansats och bestod av semistrukturerade intervjuer med tre åklagare och tre poliser. Intervjudeltagarna valdes med strategiska urval samt snöbollsurval och utgår ifrån ett induktivt tillvägagångssätt som innebär att studien inte grundar sig i någon teori. Den befintliga forskningen kring sugardating är tunn och det finns många kunskapsluckor att fylla. Tolkningen av resultatet visade att de olika yrkeskategorierna hade samstämmiga uppfattningar om sugardating: att sugardating utifrån de ärenden som de hanterar är förtäckt prostitution. Åklagarnas och polisernas uttalanden om vilka inslag som kan förekomma i sugardating styrker den tidigare forskningen, att sugardating kan vara en kombination mellan dating och eskortverksamhet. Det upptäcktes dock vissa skillnader i perspektiven mellan de två yrkeskategorierna, en av skillnaderna var medvetenheten hos dem som agerar sugarbabes. Deltagarnas uppfattning var överensstämmande om att sugardating som koncept är problematiskt och att det är en inkörsport till prostitution.

Abstract [en]

The purpose of the study was to find out if there are differences and /or similarities between prosecutors' and police's opinions regarding sugardating. The study also aimed to find out if sugardating as a concept should or should not be covered by the law purchase of sexual service based on its criminal grounds, and whether sugardating can be a gateway to prostitution. The study had a qualitative approach and consisted of semistructured interviews with three prosecutors and three police officers. The interview participants were chosen with strategic selection and snowball selection and based on an inductive approach, which means that the study is not based on any theory. The existing research on sugardating is scant and there are many gaps in knowledge to fill. The interpretation of the results showed that the different occupational categories had consistent views on sugardating: that sugardating based on the cases they handle is disguised prostitution. Prosecutors' and police's statements about which elements can be found in sugardating confirm previous research that sugardating can be a combination between dating and escort activities. However, some differences in the perspectives between the two occupational categories were discovered, one of the the differences was the awareness of those who act sugarbabes. The participants' opinion was consistent that sugardating as a concept is problematic and that it is a gateway to prostitution.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 40
Keywords [en]
sugardating, transactional sex, sugarbabe, prostitution, criminal grounds
Keywords [sv]
Sugardating, transactional sex, sugarbabe, prostitution, kriminaliseringsgrunder
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-80830OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-80830DiVA, id: diva2:1416781
Subject / course
Criminology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2020-03-25 Created: 2020-03-25 Last updated: 2020-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(355 kB)36 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 355 kBChecksum SHA-512
2185cc2d88223db7c879afec0fa8e3dd45bfead1a7d3dcd1122f819038572e4d647fbde50668fbd6a7a6f2e7ac4869e2aee8fc95ccffff37d54b293878ce7196
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 36 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf