To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Importance of cerebral artery recanalization in patients with stroke with and without neurological improvement after intravenous thrombolysis
Karolinska Stroke Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stroke Unit, Department of Neurosciences (Neurology), Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital.
Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense Madrid, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 262013 (English)In: Stroke, ISSN 0039-2499, E-ISSN 1524-4628, Vol. 44, no 9, p. 2513-2518Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recanalization status after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with ischemic stroke is a reference point to proceed with a rescue reperfusion intervention, although early neurological improvement (NI) may preclude endovascular procedures. We aimed to evaluate the importance of restoration of blood flow at the arterial occlusion site in subgroups of patients with stroke stratified by early NI after IVT.

METHODS: The following patients were recruited from the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register: (1) with baseline vessel occlusion documented by computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and follow-up angioimaging between 22 and 36 hours after IVT available; and (2) with dense cerebral artery sign on admission CT scan and results of follow-up CT reported. Recanalization at 24 hours was defined as absence of vessel occlusion or as resolution of dense cerebral artery sign on follow-up 22- to 36-hour imaging. NI was assessed at 2 hours and 24 hours after IVT and was defined as improvement by 20% from baseline National Institute of Health Stroke scale score. Primary outcome measure was independence, defined as modified Rankin scale score 0 to 2 after 3 months.

RESULTS: Of 28136 cases registered between December 2003 and November 2009, 5324 cases (19%) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with both NI at 2 hours post-treatment and vessel recanalization had the best chances to achieve independence at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio, 15.8; 95% confidence interval, 12.5-20.0), followed by those who had NI despite persistent occlusion (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.6-6.1); and those without NI despite recanalization (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.3).

CONCLUSIONS: Recanalization of an occluded artery in acute stroke is associated with favorable functional outcome both in patients with and without NI after IVT. In future evaluations of mechanical thrombectomy and other additional strategies, recanalization should be considered in patients with persisting occlusion after IVT even after significant NI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013. Vol. 44, no 9, p. 2513-2518
Keywords [en]
Early neurological improvement, intravenous thrombolysis, recanalization, stroke
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-81154DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000048ISI: 000329982500040PubMedID: 23881960Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84884501371OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-81154DiVA, id: diva2:1423878
Note

SITS-ISTR is funded by an unrestricted grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ferrer, and by a grant from European Union Public Health Executive Authority. Financial support was also provided through the regional agreement on medical training and research (ALF Foundation) between Stockholm County Council and the Karolinska Institute. This study is a part of the Fighting Stroke Project (Uppdrag Besegra Stroke), supported by the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation and Karolinska Institutet. The project is supported by funding from Friends of Karolinska Institutet, United States, and Johanniterorden. The views expressed are those of the authors. T. Kharitonova and N. Wahlgren had full access to all data in this study, and had the final responsibility for the preparation of this article and its submission for publication.

Available from: 2020-04-16 Created: 2020-04-16 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

von Euler, Mia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Euler, Mia
In the same journal
Stroke
Medical and Health SciencesNeurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 142 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf