To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Quality of Dyadic Relationships scale: homogeneity and construct validity
Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3283-4312
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0136-3079
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Infectious Diseases.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8813-0384
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Neurology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6681-0546
2021 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 35, no 2, p. 468-475Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Rationale and aims: The Quality of Dyadic Relationships is a self-assessment scale used to evaluate various aspects of relationship quality. Psychometric evaluation by the developers of the instrument has led to a nontested amended version. Further psychometric testing is thus warranted, and the aim of this study was to evaluate homogeneity, construct validity (in terms of concurrent, discriminant and known-groups validity) and any floor and ceiling effects of the Quality of Dyadic Relationships.

Methods: Forty-seven cohabitant couples (47 women with a mean age of 30.0 years and 47 men with a mean age of 31.5 years) answered the Quality of Dyadic Relationships, the Relationship Assessment Scale (to test concurrent validity) and the Perceived Stress Scale (to test discriminant validity). Homogeneity (internal consistency) was calculated by Cronbach's alpha. Concurrent and discriminant validity were estimated as correlations between Quality of Dyadic Relationships and the other instruments. Assessment of known-groups validity was based on the variables of parental status and gender. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated according to frequency distribution.

Results: The overall homogeneity was good with acceptable Cronbach's alpha values (alpha > 0.70) for all subscales but dyadic sexuality. Concurrent validity and discriminant validity were found. Known-groups validity was indicated by significant differences between individuals with different parental status on the total QDR index, where the ones without children scored higher. No difference between the genders was found. No significant floor effects were found, but a significant ceiling effect was found in the subscale dyadic sensuality, with 27.7% of respondents scoring maximum.

Conclusion: In all, the QDR showed promising psychometric properties and may be used for screening and follow-up purposes. However, it can benefit from further development, as suggested by the ceiling effect in the subscale dyadic sensuality and the low internal consistency in the subscale dyadic sexuality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Publishing, 2021. Vol. 35, no 2, p. 468-475
Keywords [en]
couples, assessment, outcomes, psychometric evaluation, homogeneity, construct validity, QDR, RAS
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-81419DOI: 10.1111/scs.12858ISI: 000525973500001PubMedID: 32285516Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85083294675OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-81419DiVA, id: diva2:1427650
Note

Funding Agencies:

Region Östergötland  

Region Örebro  

Örebro University 

Available from: 2020-04-30 Created: 2020-04-30 Last updated: 2021-06-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ingberg, EdvinStröm, Jakob O.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gudjonsdottir, JohannaEklund, MonaIngberg, EdvinStröm, Jakob O.
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf