To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Markers of systemic inflammation in preclinical ulcerative colitis
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. (Department of Gastroenterology)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1906-0746
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. (Department of Gastroenterology)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6598-1984
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Umea University, Umeå, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. (Department of Gastroenterology)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1046-383x
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: United European Gastroenterology journal, ISSN 2050-6406, E-ISSN 2050-6414, Vol. 7, no 8_suppl, p. 111-111Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Data on the preclinical stage of ulcerative colitis (UC) are sparse. At diagnosis, UC often shows a modest increase in systemic inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP). However, a subclinical inflammation with elevated levels of CRP and interleukin-6 (IL6) in serum have been observed several years before diagnosis [1]. First-degree relatives, including healthy twin siblings, also display elevated levels of some inflammatory markers as a consequence of shared genetic and environmental risk factors [2]. It is reasonable to believe that the preclinical inflammation, reflecting early pathogenic mechanisms, ultimately leads to a diagnosis of UC.

Aim and Method: We aimed to deeper examine the systemic preclinical inflammation in UC using a comprehensive set of protein markers. Cases with UC were identified at clinical follow-up of a prospectively collected population-based cohort of healthy individuals from northern Sweden. Plasma samples from cases and controls were subjected to proximity extension assay for relative quantification of 92 protein markers of inflammation. Results were validated in an inception cohort of treatment naïve, newly diagnosed patients with UC (n=101) vs. healthy controls (n=50). In addition, to examine the impact of shared genetic and environmental factors, a cohort of healthy mono- and dizygotic twin siblings of twins with UC (n=41) and matched healthy controls (n=37) were explored.

Results: Pre-diagnostic plasma samples from 72 cases who later in life developed UC and 140 controls, matched for gender, age, year of health survey and area of residence, were identified (table 1). Six proteins were significantly upregulated (p<0.05) in pre-diagnostic UC compared to matched healthy controls. A receiver-operating curve based prediction model using the six protein markers combined with sex, age, smoking status and time to diagnose was set up for validation. The model discriminated newly diagnosed, treatment naïve UC cases from healthy controls (AUC=0.96; CI 0.93-0.98). An AUC of 0.73 (CI 0.62-0.84) was observed when the model was applied to healthy twin siblings vs. healthy controls and four out of six proteins were upregulated similarly as in the pre-diagnostic samples. The relative levels of the six proteins showed an intermediate upregulation in pre-diagnostic samples and samples from healthy twin siblings compared to samples at diagnosis of UC. Only one protein showed a significant correlation with time to diagnosis in the pre-diagnostic samples. Using pathway analysis, the six protein upregulations pointed towards subclinical inflammation in UC being caused by dysregulation of four immune pathways.

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive characterisation of preclinical systemic inflammation in UC. Inflammatory proteins were upregulated several years prior to diagnosis of UC and to some extent these alterations were also seen in healthy twin siblings of UC patients. Characterisation of the preclinical stage of UC could pave the way for identification of predictive biomarkers and preventive strategies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2019. Vol. 7, no 8_suppl, p. 111-111
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-82861DOI: 10.1177/2050640619854670ISI: 000491170000001PubMedID: 32213000Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084964275OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-82861DiVA, id: diva2:1437863
Available from: 2020-06-09 Created: 2020-06-09 Last updated: 2021-03-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bergemalm, DanielAndersson, ErikEriksson, CarlRepsilber, DirkHalfvarson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergemalm, DanielAndersson, ErikEriksson, CarlRepsilber, DirkHalfvarson, Jonas
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
United European Gastroenterology journal
Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 379 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf