To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Improving Screening Efficiency through Iterative Screening Using Docking and Conformal Prediction
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Karolinska Institute, Unit of Toxicology Sciences, Södertälje, Sweden; Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Kista, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3107-331X
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
2017 (English)In: Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, ISSN 1549-9596, E-ISSN 1549-960X, Vol. 57, no 3, p. 439-444Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

High-throughput screening, where thousands of molecules rapidly can be assessed for activity against a protein, has been the dominating approach in drug discovery for many years. However, these methods are costly and require much time and effort. In order to suggest an improvement to this situation, in this study, we apply an iterative screening process, where an initial set of compounds are selected for screening based on molecular docking. The outcome of the initial screen is then used to classify the remaining compounds through a conformal predictor. The approach was retrospectively validated using 41 targets from the Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E), ensuring scaffold diversity among the active compounds. The results show that 57% of the remaining active compounds could be identified while only screening 9.4% of the database. The overall hit rate (7.6%) was also higher than, when using docking alone (5.2%). When limiting the search to the top scored compounds from docking, 39.6% of the active compounds could be identified, compared to 13.5% when screening the same number of compounds solely based on docking. The use of conformal predictors also gives a clear indication of the number of compounds to screen in the next iteration. These results indicate that iterative screening based on molecular docking and conformal prediction can be an efficient way to find active compounds while screening only a small part of the compound collection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Washington: American Chemical Society (ACS), 2017. Vol. 57, no 3, p. 439-444
National Category
Chemical Sciences Computer and Information Sciences Pharmaceutical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-83141DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00532ISI: 000397838100008PubMedID: 28195474Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85025081305OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-83141DiVA, id: diva2:1440445
Funder
Region StockholmKnut and Alice Wallenberg FoundationSwedish Research Council
Note

Ytterligare forskningsfinansiär: Swedish Pharmaceutical Society

Available from: 2017-05-19 Created: 2020-06-15 Last updated: 2020-07-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Norinder, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norinder, Ulf
In the same journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Chemical SciencesComputer and Information SciencesPharmaceutical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf