To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Proposing a typology of intimate partner violent men: Implications for risk assessment and management
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. (Center for Criminological and Psychosocial Research)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9397-8304
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University, Australia. (Center for Criminological and Psychosocial Research)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8285-0935
2019 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Background: Unlike traditional beliefs male intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators are a heterogeneous group of offenders and, thus, differ from each other in several important aspects. However, there is no agreed upon procedure for creating such typologies.

Objective: The aim of this presentation is to propose a typology of IPV perpetrators that can be practically useful for the police and other criminal justice professionals, in terms of risk assessment and management for future such violence.

Method: The results are based on (a) a sample of 628 male IPV perpetrators reported to the Swedish police for allegedly perpetrating IPV towards a current or former female partner, and (b) a systematic review of IPV perpetrator typology papers.

Results: The results of both the empirical data and the systematic review favor a two-subtype typology, consisting of a partner only violent subtype and a generally violent subtype (N = 301 and N = 327, respectively, in our empirical data). The subtypes differed on several behavioral and psychosocial risk factors, as well as in terms of IPV recidivism.

Discussion: The differences between the subtypes in our proposed typology are important to consider in terms of risk assessment and management of IPV. Thus, the generally violent subtype demonstrated more risk factors and higher recidivism rates than the partner only violent subtype. As such, identifying IPV perpetrators as either partner only violent or generally violent is an important first step in any IPV violence risk assessment. Subsequently, the risk management strategies that follow a risk assessment should be tailored to the specific subtype’s risk factors (needs). Policy implications of the proposed typology will be also discussed.

Conclusions: The results our research support the notion that IPV perpetrators should be considered as a heterogeneous group of offenders, although much valuable information and guidance in assessing risk and planning risk management strategies can be gained from differentiating between partner only violent and generally violent IPV perpetrators.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019.
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-83297OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-83297DiVA, id: diva2:1442351
Conference
The Fifth International Conference on Law Enforcement and Public Health (LEPH 2019), Edinburgh, Scotland, October 21-23, 2019
Available from: 2020-06-17 Created: 2020-06-17 Last updated: 2020-07-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Petersson, JoakimStrand, Susanne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Petersson, JoakimStrand, Susanne
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 218 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf