To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
From Boulder to Stockholm in 70 Years: Single Case Experimental Designs in Clinical Research
Health Psychology Research, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leuven, Belgium; Experimental Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0437-6665
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto CA, USA.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: The Psychological Record, ISSN 0033-2933, E-ISSN 2163-3452, Vol. 70, no 4, p. 659-670Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

With the objective of increasing the magnitude of treatment effects in behavioral health, there is steadily growing interest in tailoring assessments and interventions to better match individual needs. This aligns with the central idea that behavior can be adequately understood by considering the unique characteristics of the individual and context. Thus, data collected at an individual level provides critical evidence that can be used to inform health care decisions, improve treatment, or refine theories. Yet, the majority of research in behavioral health is based on group-level analyses. Recent developments in the field of single-case experimental design (SCED) has provided new opportunities to utilize individual data. The present article provides a state-of-the art overview regarding key aspects of SCED, including a historical background to why and how SCED emerged, declined, and recently reemerged as well as methodological aspects such as design issues, challenges related to reliability and validity of repeated observations, innovations in visual and statistical analyses of individual data, strategies to deal with missing values, methodology to examine effect size, and approaches to summarize data from a large number of SCEDs using multilevel models and meta-analyses of replication data. Finally, the article discusses key concerns and actions needed to move the field forward.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. Vol. 70, no 4, p. 659-670
Keywords [en]
Single case experimental design, Idiosyncratic assessment, Treatment outcome, Effectiveness research
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-84511DOI: 10.1007/s40732-020-00402-5ISI: 000537678700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086084986OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-84511DiVA, id: diva2:1457852
Available from: 2020-08-13 Created: 2020-08-13 Last updated: 2022-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Linton, Steven J.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.Linton, Steven J.
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
The Psychological Record
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 170 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf