To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding the persistence of caste: A commentary on cotterill, Sidanius, Bhardwaj and Kumar (2014)
Department of Psychology, Christ University, Bengaluru, India.
School of Psychology, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7048-9786
Zakir Husain Centre for Educational Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
2016 (English)In: The Journal of Social and Political Psychology, E-ISSN 2195-3325, Vol. 4, no 2, p. 554-570Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We contextualise Cotterill, Sidanius, Bhardwaj, and Kumar’s (2014) paper within a broader literature on caste and collective mobilisation. Cotterill and colleagues’ paper represents a fresh and timely attempt to make sense of the persistence of castef rom the perspective of Social Dominance Theory. Cotterill and colleagues, however, do not examine caste differences in the endorsement of karma, and take behavioural asymmetry among lower castes for granted. Cotterill and colleagues also adhere to a Varna model of the caste system that arguably is simplistic and benefits the upper castes of Indian society. We caution that emphasising behavioural asymmetry and endorsing the Varna model might further stigmatise lower castes, especially Dalits, and feed into a conformity bias already predominant in caste-related psychological research. We argue that the conceptualisation and operationalisation of Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and legitimising myths in the Indian context needs to take into account the particular meaning and functions of these constructs in specific intergroup contexts, and for identity positions salient within these contexts. We contend that any examination aimed at better understanding the nature of social hierarchy and oppression within the caste system and Indian society in general remains inconclusive without including a focus on the construction and contestation of social categories and social identities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 4, no 2, p. 554-570
Keywords [en]
legitimising ideologies, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance theory, conformity bias, caste system in India, self-categorisation, social identity
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-85402DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v4i2.603Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85015379023OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-85402DiVA, id: diva2:1464003
Available from: 2020-09-03 Created: 2020-09-03 Last updated: 2020-09-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Khan, Sammyh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Khan, Sammyh
In the same journal
The Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 109 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf