To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
General practitioners' knowledge of leg ulcer treatment in primary healthcare: an interview study
School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1110-0782
2020 (English)In: Primary Health Care Research and Development, ISSN 1463-4236, E-ISSN 1477-1128, Vol. 21, article id e34Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: To describe general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge and the development of their knowledge regarding leg ulcer treatment when treating patients with leg ulceration at primary healthcare centers.

BACKGROUND: Earlier research regarding GPs' knowledge of leg ulcer treatment in a primary healthcare context has focused primarily on the assessment of wounds and knowledge of wound care products. Less is known about GPs' understandings of their own knowledge and knowledge development regarding leg ulceration in the everyday clinical context. This study, therefore, sets out to highlight these aspects from the GPs' perspective.

METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 individual GPs working at both private and county council run healthcare centers. The data were analyzed inductively using a thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Four themes were identified. 'Education and training' describe the GPs' views regarding their knowledge and knowledge development in relation to leg ulcer treatment. 'Experience' refers to GPs' thoughts about the importance of clinical experience when treating leg ulcers. 'Prioritization' describes the issues GPs raised around managing the different knowledge areas in their clinical work. 'Time constraints' explore the relationship between GPs' sense of time pressure and their opportunities to participate in professional development courses.

CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the GPs working in primary healthcare are aware of the need for ongoing competence development concerning leg ulceration. They describe their current knowledge of leg ulcer treatment as insufficient and point to the lack of relevant courses that are adapted for their level of knowledge and the limited opportunities for clinical training.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press, 2020. Vol. 21, article id e34
Keywords [en]
GP, experiences, knowledge, knowledge development, leg ulcer treatment
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-85994DOI: 10.1017/S1463423620000274ISI: 000572111600001PubMedID: 32967749Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85091544959OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-85994DiVA, id: diva2:1471217
Funder
Stockholm County CouncilAvailable from: 2020-09-28 Created: 2020-09-28 Last updated: 2020-10-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wiegleb Edström, DesiréeEdelbring, Samuel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wiegleb Edström, DesiréeEdelbring, Samuel
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesSchool of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Primary Health Care Research and Development
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 204 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf