To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The first eight months of Sweden's COVID-19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Paediatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York NY, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1024-5602
2020 (English)In: Acta Paediatrica, ISSN 0803-5253, E-ISSN 1651-2227, Vol. 109, no 12, p. 2459-2471Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim COVID-19 has affected millions of people worldwide. This paper reviews the Swedish pandemic response. Methods A narrative review was carried out and a timeline constructed. Results By September 1, 2020, 0.8% of Swedish residents had tested positive for the virus and 0.06% of the population had died, which was higher than neighbouring Nordic countries, but lower than some European countries with general lockdowns. The main actors were the Public Health Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, the Civil Contingencies Agency and the Government. County councils and regions implemented policies, in conjunction with the Department of Education and county administrative boards. Sweden's response was less invasive than many other countries, with no general lockdown. It focused on mitigation: slowing, but not stopping, the pandemic. Physical distancing was recommended in public spaces, but mandatory in bars, restaurants and at events. Visits to nursing facilities were banned. Kindergartens and schools for children up to 16 stayed open, but closed for older children for three months. There were no enforced quarantines for infected households or geographical regions, and facemasks were not recommended outside health care. Conclusion Sweden chose a different pandemic strategy to its peer nations. This paper examines the first eight months.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 109, no 12, p. 2459-2471
Keywords [en]
coronavirus, COVID-19, pandemic, social distancing, transmission
National Category
Pediatrics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-86821DOI: 10.1111/apa.15582ISI: 000576661300001PubMedID: 32951258Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85092315078OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-86821DiVA, id: diva2:1479451
Available from: 2020-10-27 Created: 2020-10-27 Last updated: 2023-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ludvigsson, Jonas F.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ludvigsson, Jonas F.
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Acta Paediatrica
Pediatrics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 274 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf