To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Computerized Version of Memory Tasks of the Betula Study
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9862-3032
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, ISSN 2008-126X, E-ISSN 2228-7442, Vol. 11, no 4, p. 535-548Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of an Iranian computerized memory battery modeled after the Betula study.

Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of an Iranian computerized memory battery modeled after the Betula study (Nilsson et al., 1997). The researchers developed this battery as an assessment tool in the Sepidar prospective cohort study. One hundred and ninety-nine participants aged 19-83 years were tested extensively on different aspects of memory. Exploratory factor analysis of the data demonstrated factors similar to those reported by the Betula study. 

Results: The authors succeeded to converge the cross-sectional findings of the study and the data from longitudinal studies of memory aging by correcting possible cohort effects. Investigating age differences in episodic and semantic memory factor scores corrected by education and socioeconomic status revealed no significant difference between younger and older adults before ages 53 to 60, though linear age-related declines existed thereafter.

Conclusion: The results support the reliability and construct validity of this computerized battery for memory assessment in Iranian adults.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Theran, Iran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences , 2020. Vol. 11, no 4, p. 535-548
Keywords [en]
Memory, Aging, Education, Iran, Cross-sectional
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-87497DOI: 10.32598/bcn.9.10.105ISI: 000585810200017PubMedID: 33613892Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85065017730OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-87497DiVA, id: diva2:1502671
Note

Originally article is written in Persian.

Available from: 2020-11-20 Created: 2020-11-20 Last updated: 2021-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Computerized Version of Memory Tasks of the Betula Study(1630 kB)342 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1630 kBChecksum SHA-512
da9a1518204c584076fe5b54ea11c1a0937f03db29b53a6cd64d4485823dd4a3caf537c3618d65f0f19427f836ecec3f4c178e3862bc10009035525c777aa3a5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kormi-Nouri, Reza

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kormi-Nouri, Reza
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 342 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 256 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf