To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards capability-adjusted life years in public health and social welfare: Results from a Swedish survey on ranking capabilities.
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö (IKVM), Division of Social Medicine and Global Health (SMGH), Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 15, no 12, article id e0242699Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to rank capabilities and suggest a relevant set of capabilities for the Swedish context to inform the development of capability-adjusted life years (CALYs). CALYs is a quality of life measure for policy making based on the capability approach by Amartya Sen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Swedish governmental review proposed the following 10 relevant capabilities: time, financial situation, mental/physical health, political resources, knowledge, living environment, occupation, social relations, security, and housing. Researchers in health-related disciplines from 5 universities ranked these capabilities from 1 to 10 (most to least important) in a web-based cross-sectional survey; 115 of 171 responses were eligible.

RESULTS: Health, social relations, and financial situation were deemed most important. Stratification by gender, research field, and age group revealed few differences. We found that it was possible to rank capabilities and that health, social relations, and financial situation were ranked highest by a non-representative sample of researchers and doctoral students from health-related disciplines at five Swedish universities.

CONCLUSIONS: The revealed ranking is dependent on the metric and must be further explored. The findings support continued development of CALYs for monitoring and evaluating outcomes in public health and social-welfare interventions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PLOS , 2020. Vol. 15, no 12, article id e0242699
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-87752DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242699ISI: 000596503200010PubMedID: 33259528Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097035100OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-87752DiVA, id: diva2:1506340
Available from: 2020-12-03 Created: 2020-12-03 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hagberg, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagberg, Lars
By organisation
School of Health SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf