To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Drug survival of anti-TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second-line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Gastroenterology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4923-3169
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1046-383x
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Stockholm South General Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, ISSN 0269-2813, E-ISSN 1365-2036, Vol. 53, no 4, p. 471-483Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second-line anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second-line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS: A propensity score-matched cohort was created using Swedish nationwide registers. Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, exposed to first-line anti-TNF treatment, who initiated a second anti-TNF agent or vedolizumab in 2014-2016 (N = 1363) were included. The primary outcome was drug survival at 12 months. Secondarily, we assessed survival without IBD-related hospitalisation, IBD-related surgery, antibiotics, or hospitalisation because of infection, and also corticosteroid exposure.

RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 400 patients (Crohn's disease, N = 198; ulcerative colitis, N = 202) remained. For Crohn's disease, drug survival was 73% in the vedolizumab group vs 74% in the anti-TNF group (difference: 1 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI]:-11-13; P = 0.87). Survival without IBD-related hospitalisation (82% vs 88%), surgery (82% vs 89%), antibiotics (65% vs 71%), hospitalisation due to infection (95% vs 88%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different between groups. For ulcerative colitis, drug survival was 69% in the vedolizumab group vs 62% in the anti-TNF group (difference: -7 percentage points; 95% CI: -20 to 6; P = 0.30). Vedolizumab-treated patients had lower survival without IBD-related hospitalisation (82% vs 93%, P = 0.02). Survival without colectomy (93% vs 97%), antibiotics (81% vs 70%), hospitalisation due to infection (92% vs 92%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on Swedish clinical practice, the effectiveness and safety of second-line anti-TNF and vedolizumab at 12 months appeared largely similar.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Science Ltd. , 2021. Vol. 53, no 4, p. 471-483
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-88172DOI: 10.1111/apt.16193ISI: 000600055200001PubMedID: 33340426Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100804411OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-88172DiVA, id: diva2:1512154
Note

Funding Agency:

Takeda Pharma AB IISR-2017-101937

Available from: 2020-12-22 Created: 2020-12-22 Last updated: 2024-04-02Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Clinical aspects of biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Clinical aspects of biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including its main subtypes, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory condition that affects the entire gastrointestinal system. Biological treatment has revolutionized the therapeutic armamentarium in the past two decades. The growing number of therapeutic options advocates for head-to-head comparisons, evaluation in clinical practice and assessment of safety. Therefore, this thesis aims to evaluate different facets of biological treatment in real-world cohorts.

In Paper I, we examined the potential effectiveness of golimumab in Crohn’s disease using data from The Swedish National Quality Register for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SWIBREG). The findings indicate a drug retention rate of 35% after a median follow-up of 89 (IQR: 32–158) weeks. Paper II constituted a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study investigating the effectiveness of vedolizumab and its impact on quality of life in a Swedish clinical setting. The percentage of patients in clinical remission after 52 weeks was 41% for Crohn's disease and 47% for ulcerative colitis. Improvements in biochemical markers and health-related quality of life measures were observed at 12 and 52 weeks in both subtypes of IBD. In Paper III, second-line biological treatments were compared in propensity score-matched cohorts based on combined data from multiple high-quality Swedish nationwide registers. The effectiveness and safety of secondline anti-TNF and vedolizumab were similar at 12 months in Crohn’s disease (n=198) and ulcerative colitis (n=202). Based on propensity score-matched data from nationwide health registers, Paper IV showed that vedolizumab was associated with higher hazard ratios of serious infections than anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease but not in ulcerative colitis.

To conclude, this thesis suggests that golimumab might have a role in treating Crohn’s disease. It also increased knowledge about the real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab. Lastly, the thesis underscored aspects of efficacy and safety when contrasting vedolizumab with anti-TNF.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2024. p. 108
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 290
Keywords
ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, comparative effectiveness, serious infections, inflammatory bowel disease, clinical aspects, register-based studies
National Category
General Practice
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-111283 (URN)9789175295527 (ISBN)9789175295534 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-04-26, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, Tidefeltsalen, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-02-01 Created: 2024-02-01 Last updated: 2024-04-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Rundquist, SaraEriksson, CarlMontgomery, ScottHalfvarson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rundquist, SaraEriksson, CarlMontgomery, ScottHalfvarson, Jonas
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf