To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Increasing prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus when implementing the IADPSG criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1017-2124
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. (Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3552-9153
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2691-7525
Department of Geriatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Region Örebro County, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, ISSN 0168-8227, E-ISSN 1872-8227, Vol. 172, article id 108642Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIMS: Quantify the proportional increase in gestational diabetes (GDM) prevalence when implementing the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria compared to prior GDM criteria, and to assess risk factors that might affect the change in prevalence.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of cohort and cross-sectional studies between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 among pregnant women with GDM using IADPSG criteria compared to, and stratified by, old GDM criteria. Web of science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Open Grey and Grey literature reports were included. The relative risk for each study was calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed by maternal age, body mass index, study design, country of publication, screening method, sampling method and data stratified according to diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS: Thirty-one cohort and cross-sectional studies with 136 705 women were included. Implementing the IADPSG criteria was associated with a 75% (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.53-2.01) increase in number of women with GDM with evidence of heterogeneity CONCLUSIONS: The IADPSG criteria increase the prevalence of GDM, but allow movement towards more homogeneity. More studies are needed of the benefits, harms, psychological effects and health costs of implementing the IADPSG criteria.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 172, article id 108642
Keywords [en]
Gestational diabetes mellitus, IADPSG criteria, incidence, prevalence
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-88419DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108642ISI: 000632552500001PubMedID: 33359574Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85099215102OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-88419DiVA, id: diva2:1516210
Note

Funding Agency:

ALF funding Region Örebro County OLL-930268, 2019, OLL-889211, 2019

Available from: 2021-01-11 Created: 2021-01-11 Last updated: 2024-10-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy: The challenge of screening and deciding diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy: The challenge of screening and deciding diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Hyperglycaemia during pregnancy is one of the most common complicationsof pregnancy. In 2013, the World Health Organisation recommended diagnostic criteria (WHO-2013) for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), whichremains controversial due to an expected increase in prevalence, and the uncertainty as to the clinical relevance of treating these additional women or its cost-effectiveness.

Paper I involves a cross-sectional study of 4 918 pregnant women using riskfactor screening, which was poorly predictive of the WHO-2013 criteria, with an area under the curve of 40% (95% CI 24–32). In Paper II, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of GDM according to the WHO2013 criteria in 136 705 women showed a 75% (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.53-2.01) increased prevalence compared to the other GDM criteria. In Papers III-IV, a national stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of 26 160 pregnancies before and 28 509 after the implementation of the WHO-2013 criteria across eight clusters during 2018 led to a 2.90 fold increase in GDM prevalence. No significant decrease was seen in the primary outcome, large for gestational age (LGA). There were, however, health benefits in secondary outcomes for the mother and neonate. There was a significant decrease in LGA dependent on the definition used, including the clinically used in Sweden (>2SD) with adjusted OR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97). In Paper IV, the WHO2013 criteria led to increased resource use and incremental costs (€341.1 (195.9)) per pregnancy. The cost-effectiveness needs to be related to health benefits for the mother and/or neonate.

In conclusion, the current screening methods for GDM are in need of revision considering their poor predictive characteristics in finding GDM according to the WHO-2013 criteria. Implementing the WHO-2013 criteria in Sweden resulted in higher GDM prevalence with short-term increased resource use with uncertainty in costs savings and considerable healthcare benefits for the mother and neonate. This thesis provides evidence regarding the consequences of implementing the WHO-2013 criteria compared to former Swedish GDM criteria and may assist future decision-making.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2023. p. 96
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 281
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, screening, prevalence, maternal and neonatal outcomes, health economic analysis
National Category
General Practice Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-105269 (URN)9789175295053 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-06-16, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, Tidefeltsalen, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-03-30 Created: 2023-03-30 Last updated: 2024-10-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Saeedi, MaryamCao, YangFadl, HelenaSimmons, David

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Saeedi, MaryamCao, YangFadl, HelenaSimmons, David
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 132 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf