To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A simple reconstruction of the posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter and sparing of puboprostatic collar reduces the time to early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Karlstad , Värmland, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Karlstad, Karlstad, Värmland, Sweden.
2014 (English)In: Journal of endourology, ISSN 0892-7790, E-ISSN 1557-900X, Vol. 28, no 4, p. 481-486Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Incontinence is a drawback after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Several surgical methods to improve continence have been described however with contradictory results.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a modified surgical technique during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) improves postoperative continence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective nonrandomized study with two consecutive series of 100 patients in each group. The first group from 2005 to 2008 underwent a standard LRP. The second group from 2009 to 2011 was subjected to a modified LRP by sparing of puboprostatic ligaments, including the preservation of arcus tendineous, and using a simple posterior tension-releasing suture adapting the urethra stump to the bladder before the anastomosis. The patients had the same preoperative work-up and comparable preoperative baseline characteristics. The 2-year follow-up of the patients included a continence questionnaire and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Urinary peak flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (PVR) volume were assessed at 3 months. Continence was defined as 0-1 pad/day.

RESULTS: Only 99 patients were evaluated in each group. The patients had comparable operative characteristics. The continence rates after the modified technique vs the standard were 33% vs 16%, p=0.007 at 1 month; 66% vs 44%, p=0.002 at 3 months; 81% vs 67%, p=0.034 at 6 months; 92% vs 80%, p=0.024 at 12 months; and 95% vs 86%, p=0.05 at 2 years. No significant differences were found regarding voiding functions, the Qmax, the PVR volume, or the IPSS. Three patients developed urethral stricture in the standard group compared with none in the modified group. The negative margin rates were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS: The anterior preservation and posterior suture technique studied is a simple, safe, and efficient method to shorten the time to continence after LRP without adverse effects on voiding or compromising the margin rates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Mary Ann Liebert, 2014. Vol. 28, no 4, p. 481-486
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-88711DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0633ISI: 000337304100015PubMedID: 24456218Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84896920283OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-88711DiVA, id: diva2:1519882
Available from: 2021-01-19 Created: 2021-01-19 Last updated: 2021-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Daouacher, Georgios

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Daouacher, Georgios
In the same journal
Journal of endourology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf