To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge in and support for standardised cancer care pathways among general practitioners and other physicians in Sweden
School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
University Health Care Research Center, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. University Health Care Research Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5257-6261
2021 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, ISSN 0281-3432, E-ISSN 1502-7724, Vol. 39, no 1, p. 17-22Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expertise in and support of the implemented new method of cancer patient pathways (CPPs) among general practitioners (GPs) and other working physicians in Sweden.

DESIGN: A survey in the form of 10 knowledge-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and two general questions about CPPs.

SETTING: Physicians from two different regions in Sweden answered the survey between December 2018 and January 2019.

SUBJECTS: GPs in primary care compared to other physicians. 155 participants completed the survey and the response rate was 65%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians' self-estimated knowledge of CPPs in general and opinion of CPPs effect on mortality and morbidity. Their scores on 10 different MCQs. Scores were analysed in subgroups related to the physicians medical specialty and experience.

RESULTS: A majority of all physicians (63%) felt that they had insufficient knowledge regarding the procedure of CPPs, and the average score from the MCQs was 3.8 out of 10 correct answers. The results showed that GPs performed significantly better than specialists from other disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS: The low percentage of correctly answered MCQs shows that the information about the entry part of CPPs needs to be improved. The study demonstrates a support for the system with CPPs because the physicians believed in its' positive effects on morbidity and mortality, however, it also reveals a lack of self-estimated knowledge about the system with CPPs.

Key points

Cancer patient pathways (CPPs) is a newly implemented method in Sweden that aims to equalize cancer care and reduce the time to diagnosis and treatment.

  • The proficiency of when to initiate an investigation according to a specific CPP seems low. General practitioners (GPs) performed significantly better on knowledge-based questions than other specialists did.
  • Physicians rated their knowledge as insufficient regarding the procedure of CPPs.
  • A clear majority of physicians believed that CPPs promotes a lower mortality and morbidity in cancer.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021. Vol. 39, no 1, p. 17-22
Keywords [en]
Cancer patient pathway, cancer, cancer care pathway, general practitioner, primary health care
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-89460DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1880074ISI: 000616233500001PubMedID: 33555209Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100780937OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-89460DiVA, id: diva2:1526933
Available from: 2021-02-09 Created: 2021-02-09 Last updated: 2021-04-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hellgren, Mikko

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellgren, Mikko
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 224 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf