To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of data quality in the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Urology.
SDS Life Science AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Urology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1217-4289
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Scandinavian journal of urology, ISSN 2168-1805, E-ISSN 2168-1813, Vol. 55, no 2, p. 142-148Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: The National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register (NSKCR) was launched in 2005. It is used for health care quality improvement and research. The aim of this study was to validate the register's data quality by assessing the timeliness, completeness, comparability and validity of the register.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: To assess timeliness we evaluated the number of days between date of diagnosis and date of reporting the patient to the NSKCR. For completeness, we used data on number of cancer cases reported to the NSKCR compared to cases reported to the Swedish Cancer Register. Comparability was evaluated by reviewing coding routines and comparing data collected in the NSKCR to national and international guidelines. Validity was assessed by reabstraction of data from medical charts from 431 randomly selected patients diagnosed in 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016.

RESULTS: Timeliness has improved since the register started. In 2016, 76.9% and 96.5% of the patients were reported within 6 and 12 months respectively. Completeness was high, with a 99.5% coverage between 2008 and 2017. Registration forms and manuals were updated according to national and European guidelines. Improvements have been made continuously to decrease the risk of reporting mistakes and misunderstandings. Validity was high where a majority of the variables demonstrated an exact agreement >90% and few missing values.

CONCLUSION: Overall, the data quality of the NSKCR is high. Completeness, comparability and validity is high. Timeliness can be further improved, which will make it easier to follow changes and improve the care and research of RCC patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021. Vol. 55, no 2, p. 142-148
Keywords [en]
Renal cell carcinoma, quality register, validation
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-89752DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1885485ISI: 000619326700001PubMedID: 33599561Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100979959OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-89752DiVA, id: diva2:1529647
Note

Funding Agencies:

Swedish government  c

Cunty councils (ALF-agreement)  

Available from: 2021-02-19 Created: 2021-02-19 Last updated: 2023-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Landberg, AnnaLindblad, PerSundqvist, Pernilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Landberg, AnnaLindblad, PerSundqvist, Pernilla
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Scandinavian journal of urology
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 120 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf