To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical utility of 18f-fdg pet in neuroendocrine tumors prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2nd Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece.
1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
2nd Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece; Nuclear Medicine Division, Biomedical Research Foundation Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Efesiou St., Athens, Greece.
1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Cancers, ISSN 2072-6694, Vol. 13, no 8, article id 1813Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The role of 18F-FDG PET in patients with variable grades of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has not been adequately elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of 18F-FDG PET status on disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients receiving PRRT. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to July 2020 and used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) criteria to assess quality/risk of bias. A total of 5091 articles were screened. In 12 studies, 1492 unique patients with NETs of different origins were included. The DCR for patients with negative 18F-FDG PET status prior to PRRT initiation was 91.9%, compared to 74.2% in patients with positive 18F-FDG PET status (random effects odds ratio (OR): 4.85; 95% CI: 2.27–10.36). Adjusted analysis of pooled hazard ratios (HRs) confirmed longer PFS and OS in NET patients receiving PRRT with negative 18F-FDG PET (random effects HR:2.45; 95%CIs: 1.48–4.04 and HR:2.25; 95% CIs:1.55–3.28, respectively). In conclusion, 18F-FDG PET imaging prior to PRRT administration appears to be a useful tool in NET patients to predict tumor response and survival outcomes and a negative FDG uptake of the tumor is associated with prolonged PFS and OS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2021. Vol. 13, no 8, article id 1813
Keywords [en]
18F-FDG PET, PRRT, neuroendocrine neoplasm
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-91648DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081813ISI: 000644014300001PubMedID: 33920195Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85103818871OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-91648DiVA, id: diva2:1553218
Note

Funding Agency:

ENETS CoE Training Fellowship 2020 

Available from: 2021-05-07 Created: 2021-05-07 Last updated: 2021-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wallin, GöranDaskalakis, Kosmas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wallin, GöranDaskalakis, Kosmas
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Cancers
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 299 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf