To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Four Streptococcus pneumoniae Urinary Antigen Tests Using Automated Readers
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8730-6955
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Microorganisms, E-ISSN 2076-2607, Vol. 9, no 4, article id 827Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen tests (UATs) may be interpreted using automatic readers to potentially automate sample incubation and provide standardized results reading. Here, we evaluated four UATs the BinaxNOW S. pneumoniae Antigen Card (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA), ImmuView S. pneumoniae and Legionella (SSI Diagnostica, Hillerød, Denmark), STANDARD F S. pneumoniae Ag FIA (SD Biosensor, Gyeonggi, South Korea), and Sofia S. pneumoniae FIA (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA) with their respective benchtop readers for their ability to detect S. pneumoniae urinary antigen. We found that these assays had a sensitivity of 76.9–86.5%, and specificity of 84.2–89.7%, with no significant difference found among the four UATs. The assays had a high level of agreement with each other, with 84.5% of samples testing consistently across all four assays. The automatically and visually read test results from the two immunochromatographic assays, BinaxNOW and ImmuView, were compared and showed excellent agreement between the two types of reading. Immunofluorescent-based assays, Sofia and STANDARD F, had significantly less time to detect compared to the two immunochromatographic assays due to having less assay setup procedures and shorter sample incubation times. In conclusion, the four UATs performed similarly in the detection of S. pneumoniae urinary antigen, and readers can bring increased flexibility to running UATs in the clinical routine.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2021. Vol. 9, no 4, article id 827
Keywords [en]
BinaxNOW, ImmuView, STANDARD F, Sofia, Streptococcus pneumoniae, pneumococcal antigen, pneumonia, urinary antigen test (UAT)
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-91658DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9040827ISI: 000643301200001PubMedID: 33924729Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85104040472OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-91658DiVA, id: diva2:1553233
Funder
Vinnova, 2018-03896Available from: 2021-05-07 Created: 2021-05-07 Last updated: 2021-05-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Athlin, Simon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Athlin, Simon
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Microorganisms
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf