Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: a systematic review and meta-analysisDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
UCM Digestive Diseases, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain; Center for Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University; Division of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Center of Infectious Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
UCM Digestive Diseases, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain.
Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Liver Research Group, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Hepatology, ISSN 0168-8278, E-ISSN 1600-0641, Vol. 75, no 4, p. 770-785Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), point shear wave elastography (pSWE), two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2DSWE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are proposed as non-invasive tests for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study evaluated their diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
METHODS: PubMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of these index tests against histology as the reference standard, in adult patients with NAFLD. Two authors independently screened and assessed methodological quality of studies and extracted data. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (sAUC) were calculated for fibrosis stages and NASH, using a random effects bivariate logit-normal model.
RESULTS: We included 82 studies (14,609 patients). Meta-analysis for diagnosing fibrosis stages was possible in 53 VCTE, 11 MRE, 12 pSWE and four 2DSWE studies, and for diagnosing NASH in four MRE studies. sAUC for diagnosis of significant fibrosis were: 0.83 for VCTE, 0.91 for MRE, 0.86 for pSWE and 0.75 for 2DSWE. sAUC for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis were: 0.85 for VCTE, 0.92 for MRE, 0.89 for pSWE and 0.72 for 2DSWE. sAUC for diagnosis of cirrhosis were: 0.89 for VCTE, 0.90 for MRE, 0.90 for pSWE and 0.88 for 2DSWE. MRE had sAUC of 0.83 for diagnosis of NASH. Three (4%) studies reported intention-to-diagnose analyses and 15 (18%) studies reported diagnostic accuracy against pre-specified cut-offs.
CONCLUSIONS: When elastography index tests are acquired successfully, they have acceptable diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The potential clinical impact of these index tests cannot be assessed fully as intention-to-diagnose analyses and validation of pre-specified thresholds are lacking.
LAY SUMMARY: Non-invasive tests that measure liver stiffness or use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been suggested as alternatives to liver biopsy in assessing the severity of liver scarring (fibrosis) and fatty inflammation (steatohepatitis) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In this study, we summarise the results of previously published studies on how accurately these non-invasive tests can diagnose liver fibrosis and inflammation, using liver biopsy as the reference. We found that some techniques that measure liver stiffness had a good performance for the diagnosis of severe liver scarring.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 75, no 4, p. 770-785
Keywords [en]
Biomarkers, Diffusion weighted imaging, Iron-corrected T1, Liver fibrosis, Magnetic resonance elastography, Magnetic resonance imaging, NASH-MRI, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, Shear wave elastography, Transient elastography, deMILI, fibro-MRI
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-91805DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.044ISI: 000701809900006PubMedID: 33991635Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85108940286OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-91805DiVA, id: diva2:1555026
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020
Note
Review
Funding agencies:
Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking 777377
Europen Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (efpia.eu)
2021-05-172021-05-172024-09-03Bibliographically approved