To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: long-term experience of Swedish single-center
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Oncology.
Department of Oncology, Central Hospital of Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden.
Department of Medical Physics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Oncology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4876-0052
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, ISSN 1689-832X, E-ISSN 2081-2841, Vol. 13, no 3, p. 245-253Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Until now, most long-term results for brachytherapy only has been published for low-dose-rate (LDR) seeds. Due to radiobiology reasons, high-dose-rate (HDR) mono-brachytherapy is of growing interest. The aim of the study was to report long-term biochemical control rate and toxicities with HDR monotherapy.

Material and methods: This was a retrospective single-institution experience, including 229 men, clinically staged T1c-T2b, Gleason 3 + 3 (prostate specific antigen (PSA) <= 15), or Gleason 3 + 4 (PSA <= 10), consecutively treated between 2004 and 2012 with HDR brachytherapy alone, using three different fractionation schedules of 92-95 Gy (EQD(2), alpha/beta = 3). Group 4F (n = 19) had a single implant of 9.5 Gy in four fractions over 2 days. Group 3F (n = 107) had three separate implants of 11 Gy over 4 weeks. Group 2F (n = 103) had two implants of 14 Gy over 2 weeks. No adjuvant hormonal therapy was allowed.

Results: For 4F, 3F, and 2F study groups, median follow-up was 10.2, 7.1, and 6.1 years, respectively, and biochemical failure rate was 10.5%, 4.7%, and 14.6%, respectively. Early and late side effects were followed with common terminology criteria version 2.0 and patient-reported questionnaires. There were a temporary acute urethral toxicity increase, 1-2 grades over baseline lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which usually recovered. About 1/3 of the patients had a remaining one grade over baseline LUTS. Severe grade 3-4 toxicity were only found in 3.5% of patients. No rectal toxicity was observed. Erectile dysfunction (ED) was depending on age and erectile function before treatment. In patients without ED before the treatment, we found a complete ED in 21% of men at the last follow-up.

Conclusions: In the present study, HDR mono-brachytherapy was found to be an effective treatment, with mild long-term side effects difficult to differentiate from aging effects. There were no significant differences in PSA regression, PSA failure rate, and toxicity between the different fraction schedules.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Termedia Publishing , 2021. Vol. 13, no 3, p. 245-253
Keywords [en]
prostate cancer, HDR, brachytherapy, monotherapy, outcome
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-92355DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105846ISI: 000656311900002PubMedID: 34122563Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85108190871OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-92355DiVA, id: diva2:1565350
Note

Funding Agency:

Örebro County Council  

Available from: 2021-06-14 Created: 2021-06-14 Last updated: 2025-01-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with aspects on hypofractionation and high precision
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with aspects on hypofractionation and high precision
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT), including high dose rate brachy-therapy (HDR-BT) is a theoretically beneficial treatment option for curable prostate cancer. Our studies aimed to contribute to the growing body of results on the effectiveness and safety of HDR-BT both as monotherapy and as a boost in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

In paper I, 229 patients (low- and intermediate-risk) received 2 – 4 fractions of HDR-BT as monotherapy. The median follow-up time was 85 months. In total, 9.6% had a biochemical failure (BF) and severe toxicities were uncommon. The treatment was found to be effective and safe.

In paper II, 355 patients (83% classified as high- or very high risk) received EBRT (3 Gy x 14) + a single fraction of HDR-BT (14.5 Gy). The median follow-up time was 56 months. The estimated five-year failure free survival was 79 % for the whole cohort. Our results suggest that this treatment appears to be feasible in terms of efficacy.

In paper III, 34 patients who received EBRT + HDR-BT were randomized to either five or three fractions of EBRT per week. Intrafractional prostate movement was tracked in real-time using the Raypilot® system. The primary endpoint was patient-reported acute toxicity. We found no significant difference between the study groups. Target displacement was less than 2 mm during 97% of the time, supporting the use of small treatment margins.

In paper IV, 175 patients received two fractions of HDR-BT (14 Gy x 2) as monotherapy. The estimated five-year cumulative BF rate was 3% for low-risk patients and 9.6% for intermediate-risk patients. The proportion of severe urinary and bowel toxicities were low, indicating that this treatment approach is effective and safe.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2025. p. 73
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 309
Keywords
Prostate cancer, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, high dose rate, hypofractionation
National Category
General Practice
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-117125 (URN)9789175296159 (ISBN)9789175296166 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-01-10, Örebro universitet, Campus USÖ, hörsal X1, Södra Grev Rosengatan 32, Örebro, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-10-30 Created: 2024-10-30 Last updated: 2025-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Johansson, BengtStaby Olsén, JohanLundin, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, BengtStaby Olsén, JohanLundin, Erik
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 121 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf