To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Attitudes of nursing staff towards pressure ulcer prevention in primary and specialised health care: A correlational cross-sectional study
Nursing Research Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; WHO Collaborating Center for Nursing, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; The Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, A JBI Centre of Excellence, Helsinki, Finland.
Nursing Research Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; WHO Collaborating Center for Nursing, Helsinki, Finland; The Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, A JBI Centre of Excellence, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Finland.
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Wound Journal, ISSN 1742-4801, E-ISSN 1742-481X, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 399-410Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this correlational, cross-sectional study was to assess the pressure ulcer prevention attitudes of the nursing staff and to identify factors associated with it both in primary and special health care. The study was conducted with nursing staff (N = 554) working in primary and special health care units in two hospital districts in Finlandin 2018 to 2019. Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument was used for data collection. Demographic data, Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge test, and Pressure Ulcer Prevention Practice instrument were used as background variables. Data were analysed with statistical tests. Nursing staff working in primary care (n = 327) had more positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention than those in specialised care (n = 209; P = .047). Working as a wound care nurse (P = .0005), working experience after graduation (P = .0017), self-reported pressure ulcer prevention and early detection skills (P < .0001), pressure ulcer prevention knowledge (P = .0002), and views about the realisation of their unit's pressure ulcer prevention practices (P < .0001) independently explained variation in participants' attitudes. Attention should be placed on the pressure ulcer prevention attitudes of nurses who are less experienced or less skilled and who have lower pressure ulcer prevention knowledge. Positive organisational culture towards evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention practices should be promoted.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2022. Vol. 19, no 2, p. 399-410
Keywords [en]
Attitude, nurses, pressure ulcer, prevention
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-92377DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13641ISI: 000661070700001PubMedID: 34121328Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107773773OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-92377DiVA, id: diva2:1566424
Note

Funding Agency:

State Research Funding (Satakunta Hospital District)  

Available from: 2021-06-15 Created: 2021-06-15 Last updated: 2022-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Beeckman, Dimitri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Beeckman, Dimitri
By organisation
School of Health Sciences
In the same journal
International Wound Journal
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 117 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf