oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Begreppsanvändning inom missbruksvården: Granskning av tre centrala begrepp
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Örebro University.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Örebro University.
2009 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
CONCEPT HANDLING S IN THE SUBSTANCE ABUSE CARE : A study of three central concepts (Swedish)
Abstract [sv]

Studiens syfte är att undersöka eventuella skillnader i användningen av tre centrala begrepp (missbruk, tungt missbruk samt öppenvård) inom missbruksvården. De frågeställningar som behandlas är; (I) Hur används de centrala begreppen; missbruk, tungt missbruk och öppenvård i texter kring missbruksvård? (II) Om det föreligger skillnader i användandet av de tre centrala begreppen, vilka likheter respektive olikheter kan urskiljas? (III) Hur kan begreppshanteringen utav de tre centrala begreppen förstås utifrån socialkonstruktivismen? Studien har genomförts som en litteraturstudie där resultatet har analyserats utifrån ett socialkon­struktivistiskt perspektiv. Resultatet tyder på att skillnader i begrepps­hanteringen utav de tre centrala begreppen förekommer samtidigt som också vissa likheter kan urskiljas. Definitionerna av missbruk skiljer sig åt genom att vissa definitioner behandlar konsumtionsmönster hos de som nyttjar drogen medan andra menar att missbruk ska ses som ett avvikande beteende. De flesta definitionerna kring missbruk berör dock i någon mån konsekvenser utav nyttjandet. Begrepps- användningen av tungt missbruk berör främst avgränsningar mellan narkotika­missbruk och tungt narkotikamissbruk. Gällande begreppet öppenvård tycks begreppsanvändningen vara samstämmig när det gäller dess yttre ramverk men skiljer sig åt när det kommer till diskussioner om hur snävt begreppet ska vara samt vilka insatser som bör inrymmas i det.

Abstract [en]

The study aims to examine possible differences in the use of three central concepts (substance abuse, heavy substance abuse and open care) within the substance abuse care. The issues addressed are (I) how is the three central concepts used in texts about substance abuse care? (II) if differences exists in the use of the three central concepts, which similarities and differences can be found? (III) how can the use of the three central concepts be understood from the basis of social constructionism? The study is a literature review and the results have been analyzed on the basis of social constructionism. The result indicates that differences in the concept handling occur. Differences in definitions of substance abuse is seen through that certain definitions treat consumption patterns while others definitions mean that it should be seen as deviance. Similarities can be seen as the majority of definitions around substance abuse concern consequences of the use. The use of the concept “heavy substance abuse” concerns mainly demarcations between drug abuse and heavy drug abuse. The concept handling of open care is coherent in the case of its extraneous framework however differences are found when it comes to how extensive the concept should be.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 29 p.
Keyword [en]
Concepts, substance abuse care, substance abuse, heavy substance abuse, outpatients
Keyword [sv]
Begrepp, missbruksvård, missbruk, tungt missbruk, öppenvård
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-5239ISRN: ORU-JPS/SA--GY-2009/0027--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-5239DiVA: diva2:158313
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2009-05-25 Created: 2009-02-01 Last updated: 2009-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(265 kB)513 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 265 kBChecksum SHA-512
5319b871f6fa04096836f7c56c42ddb0cafe78fb8a75e093e32051ac5c0272b64e8ddd832ddc126349ddf280136399b70bb18a27f857a9132630ee1e23bc2a00
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ödman, Ann-SofieBlomberg, Kristina
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social WorkÖrebro University
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 513 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 465 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf