To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery
Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, St. George Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia of McGill University, School of Nutrition, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Yonaha General Hospital, Kuwana-city, Mie, Japan.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Clinical Nutrition, ISSN 0261-5614, E-ISSN 1532-1983, Vol. 40, no 7, p. 4745-4761Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Early oral feeding is the preferred mode of nutrition for surgical patients. Avoidance of any nutritional therapy bears the risk of underfeeding during the postoperative course after major surgery. Considering that malnutrition and underfeeding are risk factors for postoperative complications, early enteral feeding is especially relevant for any surgical patient at nutritional risk, especially for those undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery. The focus of this guideline is to cover both nutritional aspects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept and the special nutritional needs of patients undergoing major surgery, e.g. for cancer, and of those developing severe complications despite best perioperative care. From a metabolic and nutritional point of view, the key aspects of perioperative care include the integration of nutrition into the overall management of the patient, avoidance of long periods of preoperative fasting, re-establishment of oral feeding as early as possible after surgery, the start of nutritional therapy immediately if a nutritional risk becomes apparent, metabolic control e.g. of blood glucose, reduction of factors which exacerbate stress-related catabolism or impaired gastrointestinal function, minimized time on paralytic agents for ventilator management in the postoperative period, and early mobilization to facilitate protein synthesis and muscle function.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Churchill Livingstone , 2021. Vol. 40, no 7, p. 4745-4761
Keywords [en]
Bariatric surgery, ERAS, Nutritional therapy, Organ transplantation, Perioperative nutrition, Prehabilitation, Surgery
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93473DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031ISI: 000684395200030PubMedID: 34242915Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109191910OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-93473DiVA, id: diva2:1584477
Available from: 2021-08-12 Created: 2021-08-12 Last updated: 2021-08-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ljungqvist, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Clinical Nutrition
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf