To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why and how teachers make use of drawing activities in early childhood science education
Department of Applied Educational Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5269-1451
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9233-3691
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: International Journal of Science Education, ISSN 0950-0693, E-ISSN 1464-5289, Vol. 43, no 13, p. 2127-2147Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Researchers have provided many arguments for why drawing may contribute to science learning. However, little is known about how teachers in early childhood education (ECE) make use of drawing for science learning purposes. This article examines how teachers' views and framing of drawing activities influence the science learning opportunities afforded to children in the activities. We use activity theory to analyse teacher interviews and observation data from ten science classrooms (children aged 3-8 years) where drawing activities occurred. The interviews reveal that few of the teachers relate drawing to science learning specifically. Rather, they portray drawing as a component of variation in teaching and learning in general. Looking at what happens in the classrooms, we conclude that drawing has a relatively weak position as means of communicating and learning science. Instead, the teaching emphasis is on writing or on 'making a product'. However, there are examples where teachers explicitly use drawing for science learning purposes. These teachers are the same few who, in interviews, relate drawing to science learning specifically. Based on these findings, we encourage school teachers, teacher educators, and researchers to identify, and overcome,obstacles to realising the pedagogical potentials of drawing in ECE science classrooms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2021. Vol. 43, no 13, p. 2127-2147
Keywords [en]
Activity theory, teacher views, visual representations
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93654DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1953186ISI: 000675777700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85111591355OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-93654DiVA, id: diva2:1585290
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2016-03868Available from: 2021-08-16 Created: 2021-08-16 Last updated: 2024-02-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Skoog, MarianneSundberg, Bodil

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ottander, ChristinaSkoog, MarianneSundberg, Bodil
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social SciencesSchool of Science and Technology
In the same journal
International Journal of Science Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 111 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf