To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Centre of Perinatal Medicine & Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN 1470-0328, E-ISSN 1471-0528, Vol. 129, no 13, p. 2157-2165Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of induction of labour (IOL) at 41 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management until 42 weeks of gestation.

DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the Swedish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS), a multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial.

SETTING: Fourteen Swedish hospitals during 2016-2018.

POPULATION: Women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy with a fetus in cephalic position were randomised at 41 gestational weeks to IOL or to expectant management and induction at 42 gestational weeks.

METHODS: Health benefits were measured in life years and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for mother and child. Total cost per birth was calculated, including healthcare costs from randomisation to discharge after the delivery, for mother and child. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated by dividing the difference in mean cost between the trial arms by the difference in life years and QALYs, respectively. Sampling uncertainty was evaluated using non-parametric bootstrapping.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cost per gained life year and per gained QALY.

RESULTS: The differences in life years and QALYs gained were driven by the difference in perinatal mortality alone. The absolute risk reduction in mortality was 0.004 (from 6/1 373 to 0/1 373). Based on Swedish life tables, this gives a mean gain in discounted life years and QALYs by 0.14 and 0.12 per birth, respectively. The mean cost per birth was €4,108 in the IOL group (n=1 373) and €4,037 in the expectant management group (n=1 373), mean difference €71 (95% CI -€232 to €379). The ICER for IOL compared with expectant management was €545 per life year gained and €623 per QALY gained. Confidence intervals were relatively wide and included the possibility that IOL had both lower costs and better health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: IOL at 41 gestational weeks results in a better health outcome and no significant difference in costs. IOL is cost-effective compared to expectant management until 42 gestational weeks using standard threshold values for acceptable cost per life year/QALY.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Publishing, 2022. Vol. 129, no 13, p. 2157-2165
Keywords [en]
Cost-effectiveness, induction of labour, prolonged pregnancy
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-94572DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16929ISI: 000706143900001PubMedID: 34534404Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85116814588OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-94572DiVA, id: diva2:1597384
Note

Funding agencies:

Swedish County Councils (the ALF agreement: Avtal om lakarutbildning och forskning) ALFGBG-718721 ALFGBG-718591

Foundation of the Health and Medical care committee of the Region of Västra Götaland, Sweden VGFOUREG-854081 VGFOUREG-640891

Hjalmar Svensson Foundation

Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council RFR-556711 RFR-736891

Available from: 2021-09-27 Created: 2021-09-27 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Fadl, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fadl, Helena
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 162 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf