To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Teaching writing in the primary grades in Norway: a national survey
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, USA.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7372-8826
2020 (English)In: Reading and writing, ISSN 0922-4777, E-ISSN 1573-0905, Vol. 34, no 2, p. 529-563Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A sample of 1049 Norwegian teachers in grades 1–3 were surveyed about how they taught writing as well as their preparation and efficacy to do so. Although there was moderate variability in their response to survey items, most teachers provided students with a multi-faceted writing program. Teachers indicated students typically spent 20 min a day writing, and they were assigned various types of writing over the course of the school year. The average teacher applied numerous instructional practices frequently to teach writing skills, support students’ writing, provide students with feedback, and conference with them about writing. Less commonly, teachers taught planning and revising, promoted students’ motivation for writing, and applied evaluation data to adjust writing instruction. While teachers were not generally positive about their preservice preparation to teach writing, they believed that their inservice preparation was adequate. They were slightly to moderately positive about their efficacy to teach writing. Teachers’ beliefs about preparation and efficacy as well as their use of data-driven practices each uniquely predicted teachers’ reported writing practices. Recommendations for future research were offered.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. Vol. 34, no 2, p. 529-563
Keywords [en]
Writing, Instruction, Efficacy, Preparation
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-95004DOI: 10.1007/s11145-020-10080-yISI: 000557729900002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089139790OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-95004DiVA, id: diva2:1602836
Available from: 2021-10-13 Created: 2021-10-13 Last updated: 2023-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Falk, Daroon Y.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falk, Daroon Y.
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Reading and writing
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 126 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf