To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliable and valid assessment of procedural skills in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Centre for Human Resources and Education, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Centre for Human Resources and Education, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5187-7027
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, ISSN 2163-0755, E-ISSN 2163-0763, Vol. 91, no 4, p. 663-671Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Valid and reliable assessment of skills is essential for improved and evidence-based training concepts. In a recent study, we presented a novel tool to assess procedural skills in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), REBOA-RATE, based on international expert consensus. Although expert consensus is a strong foundation, the performance of REBOA-RATE has not been explored. The study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of REBOA-RATE.

METHODS: This was an experimental simulation-based study. We enrolled doctors with three levels of expertise to perform two REBOA procedures in a simulated scenario of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Procedures were video-recorded, and videos were blinded and randomized. Three clinical experts independently rated all procedures using REBOA-RATE. Data were analyzed using Messick's framework for validity evidence, including generalizability analysis of reliability and determination of a pass/fail standard.

RESULTS: Forty-two doctors were enrolled: 16 novices, 13 anesthesiologists, and 13 endovascular experts. They all performed two procedures, yielding 84 procedures and 252 ratings. The REBOA-RATE assessment tool showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97). Assessment using one rater and three procedures could ensure overall reliability suitable for high-stakes testing (G-coefficient >0.80). Mean scores (SD) for the three groups in the second procedure were as follows: novices, 32% (24%); anesthesiologists, 55% (29%); endovascular experts, 93% (4%) (p < 0.001). The pass/fail standard was set at 81%, which all experts but no novices passed.

CONCLUSION: Data strongly support the reliability and validity of REBOA-RATE, which successfully discriminated between all experience levels. The REBOA-RATE assessment tool requires minimal instruction, and one rater is sufficient for reliable assessment. Together, these are strong arguments for the use of REBOA-RATE to assess REBOA skills, allowing for competency-based training and certification concepts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021. Vol. 91, no 4, p. 663-671
Keywords [en]
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, vascular access, assessment tool, skills, clinical competence, validation, validity evidence, simulation
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-95039DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003338ISI: 000702668700023PubMedID: 34225347OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-95039DiVA, id: diva2:1603293
Available from: 2021-10-15 Created: 2021-10-15 Last updated: 2024-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Hörer, Tal M.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mikkelsen, SørenHörer, Tal M.
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf